Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

CLIPPER HERMOD

IMO: 9378163
Type: Gas carrier
Average cargo carried: 3,500 t
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: Stavanger
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.80 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Solvang ASA

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,506 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

88.1

Gas carrier (LPG) median 89.3 kg/nm (−1%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

50.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 42.3 (+18%)

Average speed

15.9 kn

Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.7 kn (+25%)

Fuel per day at sea

33.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,930 t

CO₂ emitted

18,514 t

Distance sailed

67,320 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,242 h

177 days, 48% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 76.0 kg/nm · median 81.5 (−7%)

49.8Ranks 142 of 355, lowest first124

Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 12.6 (−11%)

8.8Faster than 28% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 68.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.6 (+91%)

14.4Ranks 257 of 355, lowest first120

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports9%
From the EU52%
Into the EU35%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

768 t

4.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CLIPPER HERMOD
Gas carrier (LPG) median

60.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

CLIPPER HERMOD
Gas carrier (LPG) median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CLIPPER HERMOD
Gas carrier (LPG) median

20.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	−3.2 kn	−21%	−38%	+293%	–	3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.3 kn	−6%	−5%	−84%	–	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.8 kn	+0%	−11%	+423%	+48%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	+17%	+18%	−89%	−25%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+6.6 kn	+4%	+77%	+30%	+41%	6.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.0 kn	−28%	−35%	+212%	−61%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 28%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Solvang ASA	1,857	5,821	24,447	2,179	11.2	76.0	68.0	–
2023	not published	600	1,879	6,215	432	14.4	96.5	–	–
2022	not published	3,988	12,527	38,676	2,734	14.1	103	55.3	–
2021	not published	762	2,379	7,393	464	15.9	103	37.4	–
2020	not published	5,930	18,514	67,320	4,242	15.9	88.1	50.0	–
2019	not published	4,405	13,751	51,766	5,586	9.3	85.1	35.4	–
2018	not published	1,959	6,130	16,574	1,614	10.3	118	91.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Gas carrier (LPG) median	vs Gas carrier (LPG)	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Solvang ASA	68.0	35.6	+91%	257 of 355	DNV	B
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	B
2022	not published	55.3	42.5	+30%	211 of 348	DNV	B
2021	not published	37.4	46.9	−20%	124 of 323	DNV	B
2020	not published	50.0	42.3	+18%	195 of 339	DNV	B
2019	not published	35.4	45.9	−23%	130 of 331	DNV	B
2018	not published	91.5	53.1	+72%	209 of 297	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.