Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

SUPERSPEED 2

IMO: 9378682
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: Kristiansand
Technical efficiency: EEXI 26.08 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IB

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Color Line Marine AS

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

241

Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (+55%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

886

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 569 (+56%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

226

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 223 (+1%)

Average speed

23.1 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+46%)

Fuel per day at sea

133.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

27,572 t

CO₂ emitted

86,205 t

Distance sailed

114,603 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,952 h

206 days, 57% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 203 kg/nm · median 150 (+35%)

69.3Ranks 333 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 21.6 kn · median 15.8 (+37%)

12.0Faster than 87% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 306 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−46%)

66.8Ranks 146 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 415 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+64%)

48.6Ranks 252 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports96%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3,017 t

3.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SUPERSPEED 2
Ro-pax median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SUPERSPEED 2
Ro-pax median

14.016.018.020.022.024.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

SUPERSPEED 2
Ro-pax median

0.0200400600

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

SUPERSPEED 2
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	−2%	−2%	−1%	+22%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	−1.0 kn	−6%	−11%	+9%	+5%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	−1%	−5%	−8%	−17%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.1 kn	−3%	−2%	+2%	−56%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+1%	+1%	+4%	−73%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	−5%	−4%	−6%	+170%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.4 kn	+0%	+2%	−3%	−2%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Color Line Marine AS	23,082	72,032	113,615	5,264	21.6	203	–	–
2024	Color Line Marine AS	23,617	73,758	114,196	5,299	21.6	207	–	–
2023	not published	23,042	71,436	104,429	4,614	22.6	221	–	–
2022	not published	25,535	79,816	114,108	4,874	23.4	224	–	–
2021	not published	25,802	80,674	112,025	4,811	23.3	230	–	–
2020	not published	24,457	76,468	107,564	4,588	23.4	227	–	–
2019	not published	27,572	86,205	114,603	4,952	23.1	241	–	–
2018	not published	28,308	88,556	118,084	5,209	22.7	240	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Color Line Marine AS	306	567	−46%	146 of 408	415	253	+64%	DNV	B+C
2024	Color Line Marine AS	252	547	−54%	131 of 404	383	233	+64%	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	239	680	−65%	103 of 386	437	234	+87%	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	288	626	−54%	121 of 394	467	253	+85%	DNV	C
2021	not published	653	815	−20%	169 of 377	40.7	226	−82%	DNV	C
2020	not published	2,388	751	+218%	344 of 387	94.8	217	−56%	DNV	C
2019	not published	886	569	+56%	258 of 394	226	223	+1%	DNV	A
2018	not published	902	729	+24%	209 of 361	215	184	+17%	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.