Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

KISO

IMO
9379894
Type
Chemical tanker
Port of registry
Panama
Technical efficiency
EIV 7.92 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED

?

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
131.7 kg/nm
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
–
g CO₂/t·nm
Average speed
10.5 kn
Fuel per day at sea
33.3 t/day
Fuel consumed
287 t
CO₂ emitted
910 t
924 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
2,175 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
207 h
9 days, 2% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,314 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 73.0 kg/nm · median 81.9 (−11%)
55.0Ranks 456 of 1,314, lowest first114.9
Average speedThis ship 12.2 kn · median 11.2 (+9%)
9.1Faster than 80% of chemical tanker ships12.7
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.74 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.23 (−52%)
9.07Ranks 64 of 1,314, lowest first43.80
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU77%
  • Into the EU23%
  • At berth in the EU0%

60% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (544 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
0.0%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.0 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.015
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • KISO
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • KISO
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2023→2024−1.7 kn+80%+56%−72%–1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 80%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2024FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED2879102,17520710.5131.7––
2023not published5571,7547,63262712.273.07.74–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2024FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED––––ClassNKC
2023not published7.7416.23−52%64 of 1,314ClassNKC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

KISO (IMO 9379894): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2023–2024 | Navalyze