Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2024

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.

FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED
Ships146
CO₂ emitted859 kt
Fuel per mile94 kg/nm
Average speed10.4 kn
CO₂ at berth0.6%
Ships burning LNG2
Main segmentChemical tanker

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7

  • FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED13.3 (−21%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED6713.3−21%7910.52,1510.5%1
Segment median 16.70%

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1

  • FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED9.2 (+14%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED299.2+14%13910.32,0620.8%–
Segment median 8.10%

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1

  • FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED7.0 (−14%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED477.0−14%7310.91,4420.6%–
Segment median 8.10%

LNG carrier

CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.4

  • FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED22.6 (+206%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED122.6+206%30010.34,2980.0%1
Segment median 7.40%

Gas carrier (LPG)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.8

  • FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED170 (+375%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED2170+375%616.74,1960.7%–
Segment median 35.80%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITEDClassNK (136), ABS (6), DNV (4)10%16%100%0%

FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
SOUTH LOYALTY9537769Oil tanker78.9 g CO₂/t·nm25.2+213%12.45,912 t€109k
ENERGY SPIRITLNG9269207LNG carrier22.6 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4+206%10.336,443 t€635k
BENROMACH9658355Gas carrier (LPG)220 g CO₂/t·nm114+94%4.44,742 t€72k
CARIBBEAN GLORY9788875Oil tanker11.2 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+77%6.214,510 t€224k
EVA GOLD9888132Chemical tanker33.6 g CO₂/t·nm23.7+42%6.45,490 t€126k
PACIFIC SAPPHIRE9893058Oil tanker10.6 g CO₂/t·nm8.4+26%9.418,623 t€376k
EASTERLY BIRDIE9423724Chemical tanker20.3 g CO₂/t·nm16.5+23%11.14,743 t€78k
EVA LONDON9863857Bulk carrier11.8 g CO₂/t·nm9.7+21%11.61,782 t€30k
RGL FIRST9772864Bulk carrier5.9 g CO₂/t·nm4.9+21%10.03,666 t€67k
YM NAVIGATOR9518191Bulk carrier11.5 g CO₂/t·nm9.7+19%10.92,009 t€31k
PROGRESS TRADER9936769Bulk carrier5.8 g CO₂/t·nm4.9+19%10.73,754 t€59k
PALERMO9414292Oil tanker11.5 g CO₂/t·nm9.9+16%10.54,948 t€85k
LINUS P9749350Chemical tanker27.1 g CO₂/t·nm23.7+14%9.24,480 t€88k
SFL ARUBA9919761Chemical tanker13.7 g CO₂/t·nm12.0+14%11.39,761 t€161k
SFL BONAIRE9919773Chemical tanker13.7 g CO₂/t·nm12.0+14%11.86,105 t€121k
LAVRAKI9323077Chemical tanker18.4 g CO₂/t·nm16.5+11%11.23,949 t€89k
GOLD TRADER9907005Chemical tanker13.3 g CO₂/t·nm12.0+10%11.37,861 t€148k
ZH ZHONG XING9710892Bulk carrier8.9 g CO₂/t·nm8.1+9%11.71,285 t€23k
PACIFIC RAWAN9772022Oil tanker6.9 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+9%10.412,882 t€221k
HARDRADA9344007Oil tanker10.7 g CO₂/t·nm9.9+8%12.21,153 t€19k
MARI INNOVATORLNG9909572Chemical tanker9.2 g CO₂/t·nm8.6+7%11.42,933 t€57k
NORD OCEANIA9747120Chemical tanker9.2 g CO₂/t·nm8.6+7%11.64,144 t€69k
BENRIACH9658367Gas carrier (LPG)120 g CO₂/t·nm114+6%9.76,258 t€180k
GENEVAN TRADER9846122Bulk carrier5.2 g CO₂/t·nm4.9+5%12.55,175 t€86k
PACIFIC ANNA9772010Oil tanker4.8 g CO₂/t·nm4.5+5%11.511,101 t€179k
FMT BERGAMA9427988Chemical tanker43.4 g CO₂/t·nm41.2+5%6.84,282 t€83k
YAS9439785Oil tanker10.4 g CO₂/t·nm9.9+4%7.11,178 t€18k
LEMAN TRADER9846093Bulk carrier8.5 g CO₂/t·nm8.1+4%12.34,315 t€69k
KEY FUTURE9512329Bulk carrier6.9 g CO₂/t·nm6.7+3%7.62,648 t€40k
AMIS DOLPHIN9636371Bulk carrier8.4 g CO₂/t·nm8.1+3%12.51,759 t€35k

30 of 146 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.