Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

NAGUAL

IMO: 9380829
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 27,464 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.10 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SUPER EMMA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Beyaz Denizcilik Ltd Sti

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 27,464 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

67.6 kg/nm

General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (+92%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

5.79

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.45 (−77%)

Average speed

11.8 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+27%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,167 t

CO₂ emitted

3,669 t

3,726 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

17,258 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,468 h

61 days, 17% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 67.6 kg/nm · median 35.3 (+92%)

17.4Ranks 2,208 of 2,706, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 11.8 kn · median 9.3 (+27%)

7.0Faster than 87% of general cargo ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 5.79 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.45 (−77%)

10.14Ranks 19 of 2,706, lowest first52.37

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU22%
Into the EU63%
At berth in the EU3%

58% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,114 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

NAGUAL
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NAGUAL
General cargo median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NAGUAL
General cargo median

5.010.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.6 kn	−37%	−33%	+1,002%	−54%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 37%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	+49%	+44%	−85%	–	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 49%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2023	+1.7 kn	−15%	−0%	−75%	–	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.4 kn	+3%	−10%	+253%	+26%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.6 kn	+21%	+78%	−37%	+10%	3.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−7.1 kn	−21%	−59%	−43%	−9%	7.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Beyaz Denizcilik Ltd Sti	1,167	3,669	17,258	1,468	11.8	67.6	7.74	–
2024	Beyaz Denizcilik Ltd Sti	167	525	1,566	140	11.2	106.8	12.46	–
2023	not published	734	2,300	10,219	882	11.6	71.9	8.75	88%
2021	not published	3,508	11,027	41,553	4,197	9.9	84.4	12.47	–
2020	not published	967	3,028	11,758	1,042	11.3	82.2	9.92	–
2019	not published	1,271	4,007	18,705	2,433	7.7	68.0	9.04	–
2018	not published	2,830	8,870	32,842	2,217	14.8	86.2	9.96	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Beyaz Denizcilik Ltd Sti	5.79	25.45	−77%	19 of 2,706	Bureau Veritas	B
2024	Beyaz Denizcilik Ltd Sti	12.46	19.25	−35%	328 of 1,111	Bureau Veritas	B
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	B
2021	not published	12.47	8.57	+46%	2,828 of 3,466	Verifavia	B
2020	not published	9.92	8.24	+20%	2,142 of 3,150	Verifavia	B
2019	not published	9.04	8.38	+8%	1,935 of 3,360	Verifavia	B
2018	not published	9.96	8.50	+17%	2,210 of 3,384	Verifavia	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.