Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

ALPPILA

IMO: 9381706
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Finland
Port of registry: Helsinki
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.59 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ESL Shipping Oy

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

66.5

General cargo median 57.3 kg/nm (+16%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

17.0

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 21.6 (−21%)

Average speed

10.7 kn

General cargo median 10.8 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,723 t

CO₂ emitted

8,582 t

Distance sailed

40,976 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,837 h

160 days, 44% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 64.2 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+82%)

17.4Ranks 2,151 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 9.0 kn · median 9.3 (−3%)

6.9Faster than 41% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 18.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−26%)

10.2Ranks 719 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports76%
From the EU1%
Into the EU2%
At berth in the EU21%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,845 t

21.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ALPPILA
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ALPPILA
General cargo median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ALPPILA
General cargo median

5.010.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	−8%	−13%	+26%	+10%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	−3%	+1%	−9%	−2%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.7 kn	+9%	−8%	−13%	+3%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+2.2 kn	+1%	+27%	+71%	−4%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.3 kn	−2%	−16%	−20%	−17%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.7 kn	+3%	−4%	−7%	+18%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	+3%	+4%	−37%	+7%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	ESL Shipping Oy	2,625	8,311	40,913	4,566	9.0	64.2	–	–
2024	ESL Shipping Oy	2,278	7,181	32,506	3,454	9.4	70.1	–	–
2023	not published	2,590	8,163	35,702	3,960	9.0	72.5	–	–
2022	not published	2,723	8,582	40,976	3,837	10.7	66.5	–	–
2021	not published	1,573	4,957	23,945	2,815	8.5	65.7	17.7	–
2020	not published	2,008	6,326	29,891	3,037	9.8	67.2	21.4	–
2019	not published	2,105	6,634	32,126	3,061	10.5	65.5	18.1	–
2018	not published	3,202	10,090	50,620	4,864	10.4	63.3	16.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	ESL Shipping Oy	18.9	25.5	−26%	719 of 2,723	DNV	C
2024	ESL Shipping Oy	17.1	19.3	−11%	476 of 1,111	DNV	C
2023	not published	17.5	20.7	−15%	397 of 1,045	DNV	C
2022	not published	17.0	21.6	−21%	321 of 1,034	DNV	C
2021	not published	17.7	8.57	+106%	3,227 of 3,466	DNV	C
2020	not published	21.4	8.24	+160%	3,046 of 3,150	Lloyd's Register	C
2019	not published	18.1	8.38	+116%	3,142 of 3,360	Verifavia	C
2018	not published	16.8	8.50	+98%	3,083 of 3,384	Verifavia	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.