Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

BURHAN DIZMAN

IMO: 9381809
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Barbados
Port of registry: Bridgetown
Technical efficiency: EIV 22.06 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: BURHAN DIZMAN 1, BARVA, MV BARVA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CAPRAMAR GEMI ISLETMECILIGI LTD. STI.

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,594 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

46.3

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

–

g CO₂/dwt·nm

Average speed

9.2 kn

Fuel per day at sea

10.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,191 t

CO₂ emitted

3,817 t

Distance sailed

25,742 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,800 h

117 days, 32% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 41.0 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+16%)

17.4Ranks 1,604 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 10.4 kn · median 9.3 (+12%)

6.9Faster than 71% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 24.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−4%)

10.2Ranks 1,239 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports33%
From the EU37%
Into the EU21%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

339 t

8.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BURHAN DIZMAN
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BURHAN DIZMAN
General cargo median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

BURHAN DIZMAN
General cargo median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’212021’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.9 kn	−7%	−14%	−0%	–	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.6 kn	−9%	+6%	+32%	–	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.5 kn	+4%	+10%	−36%	–	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.1 kn	+10%	−11%	−30%	–	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.9 kn	−7%	+1%	+43%	–	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+4.4 kn	−19%	+38%	−25%	–	4.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.2 kn	+18%	−1%	−0%	+17%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CAPRAMAR GEMI ISLETMECILIGI LTD. STI.	889	2,823	21,667	2,089	10.4	41.0	–	–
2024	CAPRAMAR GEMI ISLETMECILIGI LTD. STI.	956	3,003	21,725	1,929	11.3	44.0	26.7	–
2023	not published	790	2,506	16,439	1,699	9.7	48.1	34.8	–
2022	not published	1,191	3,817	25,742	2,800	9.2	46.3	32.3	–
2021	not published	1,554	4,982	36,864	3,258	11.3	42.1	28.2	–
2020	not published	1,169	3,747	25,692	2,478	10.4	45.5	32.1	–
2019	not published	1,921	6,007	34,087	5,638	6.0	56.4	–	–
2018	not published	1,627	5,085	34,123	4,725	7.2	47.7	28.8	11%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CAPRAMAR GEMI ISLETMECILIGI LTD. STI.	24.4	25.5	−4%	1,239 of 2,723	ClassNK	A
2024	CAPRAMAR GEMI ISLETMECILIGI LTD. STI.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A
2021	not published	28.2	8.57	+229%	3,411 of 3,466	ClassNK	A+B
2020	not published	–	–	–	–	EMICERT	A
2019	not published	33.3	25.0	+33%	832 of 1,154	Korean Register	A
2018	not published	28.5	24.9	+14%	636 of 1,044	Korean Register	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.