Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

MINERVA GLORIA

IMO: 9382750
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 45,010 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.29 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Minerva Marine Inc · part of Minerva

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 45,010 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

144.1 kg/nm

Oil tanker median 129.0 kg/nm (+12%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.04

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.06 (+25%)

Average speed

7.9 kn

Oil tanker median 10.9 kn (−28%)

Fuel per day at sea

27.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

594 t

CO₂ emitted

1,863 t

1,892 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

4,123 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

519 h

22 days, 6% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,787 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 144.1 kg/nm · median 129.0 (+12%)

79.5Ranks 1,172 of 1,787, lowest first193.6

Average speedThis ship 7.9 kn · median 10.9 (−28%)

8.1Faster than 9% of oil tanker ships12.3

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.04 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.06 (+25%)

4.44Ranks 1,172 of 1,787, lowest first25.70

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU37%
Into the EU40%
At berth in the EU20%

62% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,153 t).

Fuel burned laden

43%

57% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

20.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MINERVA GLORIA
Oil tanker median

120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

MINERVA GLORIA
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MINERVA GLORIA
Oil tanker median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	−2.7 kn	−12%	−34%	−83%	−14%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+4.8 kn	−7%	+69%	+47%	+45%	4.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.5 kn	+9%	−31%	−61%	+34%	3.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	+10%	+15%	−13%	−21%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+2.0 kn	−20%	+5%	+83%	−43%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.4 kn	−1%	+23%	+17%	+42%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	Minerva Marine Inc	594	1,863	4,123	519	7.9	144.1	10.04	43%
2023	not published	3,942	12,440	24,177	2,280	10.6	163.1	11.71	–
2022	not published	2,882	9,027	16,447	2,816	5.8	175.2	8.10	–
2021	not published	6,766	21,401	42,253	4,534	9.3	160.1	6.05	–
2020	not published	7,088	22,671	48,509	5,491	8.8	146.1	7.62	–
2019	not published	4,838	15,177	26,576	3,930	6.8	182.0	13.36	–
2018	not published	4,178	13,114	22,622	4,171	5.4	184.7	9.39	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	Minerva Marine Inc	10.04	8.06	+25%	1,172 of 1,787	ABS	A
2023	not published	11.71	8.44	+39%	1,278 of 1,797	RINA	A
2022	not published	8.10	8.51	−5%	914 of 1,961	RINA	A
2021	not published	6.05	8.86	−32%	411 of 1,789	RINA	A
2020	not published	7.62	9.03	−16%	707 of 1,870	RINA	A
2019	not published	13.36	8.83	+51%	1,422 of 1,919	RINA	A
2018	not published	9.39	8.86	+6%	959 of 1,779	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.