Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

CITY OF HAMBURG

IMO: 9383558
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 405 t
Flag (estimated): France
Port of registry: Marseille
Technical efficiency: EEXI 24.30 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: LD Armateurs SASU

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 390 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

69.0

Ro-ro median 109 kg/nm (−37%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

555

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 104 (+435%)

Average speed

12.2 kn

Ro-ro median 14.8 kn (−18%)

Fuel per day at sea

20.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,079 t

CO₂ emitted

15,918 t

Distance sailed

73,546 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,042 h

252 days, 69% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 66.7 kg/nm · median 105 (−36%)

56.6Ranks 34 of 235, lowest first145

Average speedThis ship 14.8 kn · median 14.4 (+3%)

10.9Faster than 58% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 514 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.2 (+440%)

47.4Ranks 225 of 235, lowest first297

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports16%
From the EU47%
Into the EU32%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

810 t

5.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CITY OF HAMBURG
Ro-ro median

60.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CITY OF HAMBURG
Ro-ro median

12.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CITY OF HAMBURG
Ro-ro median

0.05001,0001,500

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.9 kn	−6%	+8%	+11%	−8%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.2 kn	−5%	−13%	−1%	−15%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	−0%	−2%	−22%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	+2.1 kn	+8%	+27%	+50%	+23%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.8 kn	−11%	−16%	+1%	–	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	+1%	−3%	−17%	–	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.2 kn	+5%	+7%	−4%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	LD Armateurs SASU	6,246	19,508	93,596	6,306	14.8	66.7	514	–
2024	Louis Dreyfus Armateurs SASU	5,980	18,686	84,392	6,521	12.9	70.9	561	–
2023	not published	6,368	19,905	85,654	6,061	14.1	74.3	658	–
2022	not published	8,197	25,634	110,026	7,675	14.3	74.5	680	–
2021	not published	5,079	15,918	73,546	6,042	12.2	69.0	555	–
2020	not published	5,639	17,906	73,136	5,624	13.0	77.1	1,404	–
2019	not published	6,768	21,547	88,316	6,554	13.5	76.6	1,106	–
2018	not published	6,725	21,418	92,290	6,943	13.3	72.9	1,149	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	LD Armateurs SASU	514	95.2	+440%	225 of 235	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Louis Dreyfus Armateurs SASU	561	97.5	+475%	215 of 220	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	658	109	+506%	214 of 221	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	680	90.6	+650%	222 of 223	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	555	104	+435%	216 of 219	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	1,106	90.9	+1,117%	271 of 271	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	1,149	91.0	+1,162%	259 of 260	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.