Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

CIUDAD DE CADIZ

IMO: 9383560
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 151 t
Flag (estimated): France
Port of registry: Marseille
Technical efficiency: EEXI 26.00 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: LD Armateurs SASU

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 294 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

88.5

Ro-ro median 109 kg/nm (−19%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

941

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 103 (+815%)

Average speed

11.4 kn

Ro-ro median 14.4 kn (−21%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,978 t

CO₂ emitted

15,566 t

Distance sailed

56,213 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,918 h

205 days, 56% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2024

Set against all 220 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 73.5 kg/nm · median 106 (−31%)

59.5Ranks 37 of 220, lowest first146

Average speedThis ship 13.8 kn · median 14.5 (−5%)

10.4Faster than 40% of ro-ro ships17.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 983 g CO₂/t·nm · median 97.5 (+908%)

50.7Ranks 220 of 220, lowest first309

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports32%
From the EU40%
Into the EU23%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

727 t

4.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CIUDAD DE CADIZ
Ro-ro median

60.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CIUDAD DE CADIZ
Ro-ro median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CIUDAD DE CADIZ
Ro-ro median

0.05001,0001,500

’182018’192019’202020’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	−7%	−10%	+11%	–	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	−4%	−7%	+5%	+35%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.4 kn	−6%	−9%	+1%	–	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.8 kn	+3%	+9%	−1%	–	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+2.3 kn	−10%	+7%	+50%	–	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.1 kn	+13%	+3%	−21%	+3%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+3.4 kn	−10%	+24%	+68%	−24%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	LD Armateurs SASU	6,758	21,545	99,214	7,396	13.4	68.1	1,436	–
2024LNG	Louis Dreyfus Armateurs SASU	6,538	13,211	89,001	6,467	13.8	73.5	983	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	6,506	16,239	84,835	5,998	14.1	76.7	730	–
2022	not published	6,854	20,956	83,704	5,775	14.5	81.9	1,157	–
2021	not published	6,700	20,907	84,223	6,159	13.7	79.6	883	–
2020	not published	4,978	15,566	56,213	4,918	11.4	88.5	941	–
2019	not published	5,620	17,655	71,516	5,729	12.5	78.6	916	–
2018	not published	3,724	11,681	42,476	4,692	9.1	87.7	1,209	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	LD Armateurs SASU	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	A
2024LNG	Louis Dreyfus Armateurs SASU	983	97.5	+908%	220 of 220	Bureau Veritas	A
2023LNG / alt.	not published	730	109	+572%	216 of 221	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	941	103	+815%	236 of 238	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	916	90.9	+908%	269 of 271	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	1,209	91.0	+1,228%	260 of 260	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.