Navalyze

Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

EKMEN SKY

IMO
9384174
Type
General cargo ship
Port of registry
Monrovia, Liberia
Technical efficiency
EEXI 12.60 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
MASHA D

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: EKMEN DENIZCILIK VE TICARET LTD. STI.

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
35.7 kg/nm
General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (+1%)
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)
25.53
g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.45 (+0%)
Average speed
6.5 kn
General cargo median 9.3 kn (−30%)
Fuel per day at sea
5.5 t/day
Fuel consumed
476 t
CO₂ emitted
1,499 t
1,522 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
13,331 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,066 h
86 days, 24% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 35.7 kg/nm · median 35.3 (+1%)
17.4Ranks 1,372 of 2,706, lowest first78.8
Average speedThis ship 6.5 kn · median 9.3 (−30%)
7.0Faster than 7% of general cargo ships12.1
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 25.53 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.45 (+0%)
10.14Ranks 1,364 of 2,706, lowest first52.37
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports17%
  • From the EU38%
  • Into the EU41%
  • At berth in the EU4%

60% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (906 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
4.1%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.0 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.015
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • EKMEN SKY
  • General cargo median

Average speed, kn

  • EKMEN SKY
  • General cargo median

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

  • EKMEN SKY
  • General cargo median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025−2.8 kn−0%−31%−60%+4%2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+0.5 kn−26%−21%−10%–0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−0.7 kn+14%+4%−6%–0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+0.8 kn−17%−8%+47%–0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−0.1 kn+8%+6%−31%−17%Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+2.6 kn−7%+32%+22%+14%2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−0.9 kn+12%−1%−13%+14%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025EKMEN DENIZCILIK VE TICARET LTD. STI.4761,49913,3312,0666.535.7––
2024part-yearLIBERTY BLUE SHIPMANAGEMENT GmbH & Co. KG341088408210.240.518.16–
2024EKMEN DENIZCILIK VE TICARET LTD. STI.1,1863,72533,1023,5789.335.8627.7764%
2023not published1,7635,58836,6834,1808.848.130.79–
2022not published1,6485,18438,9494,0799.542.325.64–
2021not published1,3474,23026,4103,0488.751.0––
2020not published1,8175,70938,5384,3758.847.1––
2019not published1,6045,04331,6765,0836.250.6––
2018not published1,6545,21136,5625,1597.145.2––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nmGeneral cargo medianvs General cargoRankVerifierMethods
2025EKMEN DENIZCILIK VE TICARET LTD. STI.25.5325.45+0%1,364 of 2,706Polish Register of ShippingB
2024part-yearLIBERTY BLUE SHIPMANAGEMENT GmbH & Co. KG––––EnvServiceB+C
2024EKMEN DENIZCILIK VE TICARET LTD. STI.24.4619.25+27%761 of 1,111Polish Register of ShippingB
2023not published––––EnvServiceA+C
2022not published––––EnvServiceA+C
2021not published29.2122.70+29%849 of 1,142DNVA+C
2020not published35.1824.50+44%910 of 1,167DNVA+C
2019not published30.7324.96+23%765 of 1,154DNVA+C
2018not published26.8424.89+8%586 of 1,044DNVA+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.