Navalyze · General cargo · Ship
AMIRA LOULIA
- IMO
- 9385087
- Type
- General cargo ship
- Flag (estimated)
- San Marino
- Port of registry
- San Marino
- Technical efficiency
- EEXI 6.76 g CO₂/t·nm
- Former names
- POLA AUGUSTA
ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Elamira Maritime Ltd
2018 at a glance
From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,489 t of cargo on average.
Within the general cargo fleet, 2025
Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.
Where the emissions happen, 2018
THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.
- Between EU ports41%
- From the EU55%
- Into the EU0%
- At berth in the EU4%
Over the years
Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.
Fuel kg/nm
- AMIRA LOULIA
- General cargo median
Average speed, kn
- AMIRA LOULIA
- General cargo median
CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm
- AMIRA LOULIA
- General cargo median
Year on year
| Year | Average speed | Fuel kg/nm | Fuel per day at sea | Distance | CO₂ per transport work | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024→2025 | −4.2 kn | −21% | −50% | +48% | – | 4.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade). |
| 2018→2024 | +4.6 kn | +25% | +110% | +354% | – | 4.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.
Every reporting year
One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.
Operation
| Year | ISM company | Fuel t | CO₂ t | Distance nm | Hours at seah | Average speedknots at sea | Fuel kg/nmthis ship | CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship | Laden fuel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Elamira Maritime Ltd | 1,068 | 3,364 | 17,028 | 2,411 | 7.1 | 62.7 | – | – |
| 2024 | Elamira Maritime Ltd | 905 | 2,901 | 11,469 | 1,016 | 11.3 | 78.9 | – | – |
| 2018 | not published | 159 | 508 | 2,525 | 376 | 6.7 | 62.9 | 26.9 | – |
Benchmark and verification
| Year | ISM company | CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm | General cargo median | vs General cargo | Rank | Verifier | Methods |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Elamira Maritime Ltd | 10.1 | 25.5 | −61% | 264 of 2,723 | ICS Verification Services | A |
| 2024 | Elamira Maritime Ltd | – | – | – | – | ICS Verification Services | A |
| 2018 | not published | 11.6 | 24.9 | −54% | 131 of 1,044 | Verifavia | A |
Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.