Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

LIJMILIYA

IMO: 9388819
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro, Marshall Islands
Technical efficiency: EIV 9.53 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

397

LNG carrier median 308 kg/nm (+29%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

10.0

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.9 (−8%)

Average speed

12.9 kn

LNG carrier median 13.5 kn (−4%)

Fuel per day at sea

122.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,863 t

CO₂ emitted

46,134 t

Distance sailed

37,417 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,912 h

121 days, 33% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2020

Set against all 267 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 435 kg/nm · median 297 (+47%)

202Ranks 259 of 267, lowest first397

Average speedThis ship 14.5 kn · median 14.7 (−1%)

11.8Faster than 45% of LNG carrier ships16.7

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 10.5 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 10.7 (−2%)

6.68Ranks 127 of 267, lowest first18.6

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU49%
Into the EU49%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

7,327 t

49% of all fuel; 51% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

646 t

1.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LIJMILIYA
LNG carrier median

250.0300.0350.0400.0450.0

’192019’202020

Average speed, kn

LIJMILIYA
LNG carrier median

12.513.013.514.014.515.0

’192019’202020

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

LIJMILIYA
LNG carrier median

10.010.310.510.811.0

’192019’202020

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2019→2020	+1.6 kn	+10%	+23%	−34%	+5%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2020	not published	10,728	33,815	24,661	1,705	14.5	435	–	–
2019	not published	14,863	46,134	37,417	2,912	12.9	397	–	49%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2020	not published	10.5	10.7	−2%	127 of 267	ABS	B+C
2019	not published	10.0	10.9	−8%	99 of 248	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.