Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

SCORPIO

IMO: 9389071
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 63,830 t
Flag (estimated): Cayman Islands
Port of registry: George Town
Technical efficiency: EEDI 3.42 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TMS Tankers Ltd. · part of TMS Group (Economou)

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 41,061 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

151

Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (+17%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.44 (+36%)

Average speed

10.8 kn

Oil tanker median 11.0 kn (−2%)

Fuel per day at sea

39.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,243 t

CO₂ emitted

16,384 t

Distance sailed

34,789 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,216 h

134 days, 37% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,787 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 141 kg/nm · median 129 (+9%)

79.5Ranks 1,110 of 1,787, lowest first194

Average speedThis ship 10.7 kn · median 10.9 (−2%)

8.1Faster than 44% of oil tanker ships12.3

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.90 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.06 (−14%)

4.44Ranks 654 of 1,787, lowest first25.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU48%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

2,501 t

48% of all fuel; 52% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

709 t

4.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SCORPIO
Oil tanker median

120.0140.0160.0180.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

SCORPIO
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SCORPIO
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	−6%	−7%	+48%	−40%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	−1%	−5%	−9%	+64%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.1 kn	+6%	+17%	+95%	−21%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	+3%	+2%	−29%	+18%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.6 kn	+2%	+9%	−14%	+44%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+3.9 kn	−22%	+28%	+280%	−29%	3.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	TMS Tankers Ltd.	1,496	4,667	10,602	895	11.8	141	6.04	82%
2024	TMS Tankers Ltd.	7,247	22,641	51,407	4,809	10.7	141	6.90	63%
2023	not published	5,243	16,384	34,789	3,216	10.8	151	11.5	48%
2022	not published	5,802	18,158	38,257	3,387	11.3	152	7.01	72%
2021	not published	2,816	8,835	19,644	1,921	10.2	143	8.90	–
2020	not published	3,825	11,967	27,573	2,650	10.4	139	7.55	–
2019	not published	4,337	13,526	31,977	3,273	9.8	136	5.26	–
2018	not published	1,470	4,580	8,413	1,418	5.9	175	7.46	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	TMS Tankers Ltd.	–	–	–	–	ABS	B
2024	TMS Tankers Ltd.	6.90	8.06	−14%	654 of 1,787	ABS	B
2023	not published	11.5	8.44	+36%	1,261 of 1,797	ABS	B
2022	not published	7.01	8.51	−18%	682 of 1,961	ABS	B
2021	not published	8.90	8.86	+0%	903 of 1,789	ABS	B
2020	not published	7.55	9.03	−16%	692 of 1,870	ABS	B
2019	not published	5.26	8.83	−40%	297 of 1,919	ABS	B
2018	not published	7.46	8.86	−16%	655 of 1,779	ABS	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.