Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

MARTIN I SOLER

IMO: 9390367
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Spain
Port of registry: Santa Cruz De Tenerife
Technical efficiency: EEXI 30.36 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

163

Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (+5%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

4,994

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 569 (+778%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

5,214

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 223 (+2,243%)

Average speed

17.0 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+8%)

Fuel per day at sea

66.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

16,294 t

CO₂ emitted

50,894 t

Distance sailed

99,818 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,872 h

245 days, 67% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 136 kg/nm · median 150 (−10%)

69.3Ranks 154 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 16.8 kn · median 15.8 (+6%)

12.0Faster than 60% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 267 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−53%)

66.8Ranks 136 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 281 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+11%)

48.6Ranks 212 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports78%
From the EU10%
Into the EU9%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,776 t

3.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MARTIN I SOLER
Ro-pax median

120.0140.0160.0180.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MARTIN I SOLER
Ro-pax median

14.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

MARTIN I SOLER
Ro-pax median

0.02,0004,0006,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

MARTIN I SOLER
Ro-pax median

0.02,0004,0006,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.8 kn	+7%	+20%	+6%	−66%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	−20%	−19%	+0%	−25%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.7 kn	−2%	−12%	−21%	+7%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.9 kn	−3%	−8%	+95%	+39%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.2 kn	+7%	+15%	−18%	−24%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.8 kn	−5%	−9%	−41%	−82%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−2.8 kn	−3%	−17%	+7%	+33%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	10,750	31,656	79,252	4,730	16.8	136	–	–
2024LNG	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	9,443	27,301	74,490	4,973	15.0	127	–	–
2023	not published	11,727	36,416	74,238	5,006	14.8	158	–	–
2022	not published	15,288	47,702	94,411	5,730	16.5	162	–	–
2021	not published	8,038	24,979	48,324	2,783	17.4	166	–	–
2020	not published	9,122	28,490	58,825	3,621	16.2	155	–	–
2019	not published	16,294	50,894	99,818	5,872	17.0	163	–	–
2018	not published	15,715	49,080	92,938	4,701	19.8	169	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	267	567	−53%	136 of 408	281	253	+11%	RINA	A+B+C
2024LNG	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	776	547	+42%	253 of 404	15.3	233	−93%	RINA	A+B+C
2023	not published	1,038	680	+53%	278 of 386	439	234	+88%	RINA	–
2022	not published	966	626	+54%	260 of 394	451	253	+78%	RINA	B
2021	not published	696	815	−15%	173 of 377	297	226	+32%	RINA	B
2020	not published	910	751	+21%	210 of 387	347	217	+60%	RINA	B
2019	not published	4,994	569	+778%	382 of 394	5,214	223	+2,243%	RINA	B
2018	not published	3,753	729	+415%	335 of 361	3,755	184	+1,940%	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.