Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

CAPE ANN

IMO
9390680
Type
LNG carrier
Flag (estimated)
France
Port of registry
Marseille
Technical efficiency
EEXI 7.32 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated)
LNG or an alternative fuel (no methane data to tell them apart)
?

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
258
LNG carrier median 323 kg/nm (−20%)
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
10.9
g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.9 (−1%)
Average speed
11.4 kn
LNG carrier median 13.7 kn (−17%)
Fuel per day at sea
70.3 t/day
Fuel consumed
7,268 t
CO₂ emitted
21,158 t
Distance sailed
28,194 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,480 h
103 days, 28% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 390 kg/nm · median 231 (+69%)
167Ranks 335 of 355, lowest first359
Average speedThis ship 14.3 kn · median 14.2 (+1%)
10.7Faster than 51% of LNG carrier ships16.0
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 10.7 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (+18%)
5.47Ranks 232 of 355, lowest first17.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU56%
  • Into the EU43%
  • At berth in the EU0%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
89 t
0.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • CAPE ANN
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • CAPE ANN
  • LNG carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

  • CAPE ANN
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2021→2023−0.7 kn+9%+4%+119%+35%0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2021+3.6 kn+39%+83%−86%−27%3.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 39%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2023LNG / alt.not published3,4049,7178,72960914.3390––
2021LNG / alt.not published1,4243,9393,98426515.0357––
2018LNG / alt.not published7,26821,15828,1942,48011.4258––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2023LNG / alt.not published10.79.10+18%232 of 355DNVB+C
2021LNG / alt.not published7.9510.5−24%91 of 289DNVA+C
2018LNG / alt.not published10.910.9−1%95 of 197DNVA+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.