Navalyze · General cargo · Ship
MANISA GRETA
- IMO
- 9391024
- Type
- General cargo ship
- Port of registry
- Madeira
- Technical efficiency
- EEXI 12.90 g CO₂/t·nm
ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Victoria Marine Ship Management Germany GmbH & Co KG
2025 at a glance
From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.
Within the general cargo fleet, 2025
Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.
Where the emissions happen, 2025
THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.
- Between EU ports46%
- From the EU21%
- Into the EU24%
- At berth in the EU9%
69% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,801 t).
Over the years
Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.
Fuel per mile, kg/nm
- MANISA GRETA
- General cargo median
Average speed, kn
- MANISA GRETA
- General cargo median
CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm
- MANISA GRETA
- General cargo median
Year on year
| Year | Speed | Fuel per mile | Fuel per day | Distance | CO₂ per TW | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024→2025 | +0.4 kn | −2% | +1% | −30% | −3% | 0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
| 2023→2024 | −0.7 kn | +9% | +1% | +13% | +11% | 0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade). |
| 2022→2023 | +1.2 kn | −10% | +4% | +5% | +6% | 1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
| 2021→2022 | −1.5 kn | +6% | −11% | −21% | +2% | 1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade). |
| 2020→2021 | +0.2 kn | +5% | +8% | +5% | −13% | Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change. |
| 2019→2020 | +1.1 kn | −11% | −1% | −9% | +11% | 1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
| 2018→2019 | −0.3 kn | +4% | +1% | +11% | −21% | 0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade). |
Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.
Every reporting year
One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.
Operation
| Year | ISM company | Fuel t | CO₂ t | Distance nm | At sea h | Speed kn | Fuel kg/nm | CO₂ g/t·nm | Laden fuel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Victoria Marine Ship Management Germany GmbH & Co KG | 1,284 | 4,083 | 26,884 | 3,068 | 8.8 | 47.8 | – | – |
| 2024 | Victoria Marine Ship Management Germany GmbH & Co KG | 1,879 | 5,918 | 38,386 | 4,577 | 8.4 | 49.0 | – | – |
| 2023 | not published | 1,529 | 4,807 | 34,045 | 3,759 | 9.1 | 44.9 | – | – |
| 2022 | not published | 1,619 | 5,096 | 32,446 | 4,132 | 7.9 | 49.9 | – | – |
| 2021 | not published | 1,929 | 6,107 | 41,004 | 4,374 | 9.4 | 47.0 | – | – |
| 2020 | not published | 1,740 | 5,482 | 38,873 | 4,244 | 9.2 | 44.8 | – | – |
| 2019 | not published | 2,156 | 6,784 | 42,628 | 5,231 | 8.1 | 50.6 | – | – |
| 2018 | not published | 1,874 | 5,891 | 38,432 | 4,596 | 8.4 | 48.8 | – | – |
Benchmark and verification
| Year | ISM company | CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm | General cargo median | vs General cargo | Rank | Verifier | Methods |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Victoria Marine Ship Management Germany GmbH & Co KG | 31.45 | 25.45 | +24% | 1,859 of 2,706 | DNV | B+C |
| 2024 | Victoria Marine Ship Management Germany GmbH & Co KG | 32.36 | 19.25 | +68% | 935 of 1,111 | DNV | B+C |
| 2023 | not published | 29.28 | 20.67 | +42% | 810 of 1,045 | DNV | A+B+C |
| 2022 | not published | 27.53 | 21.57 | +28% | 710 of 1,034 | DNV | B+C |
| 2021 | not published | 27.04 | 22.70 | +19% | 773 of 1,142 | Swiss Climate | A |
| 2020 | not published | 31.26 | 24.50 | +28% | 836 of 1,167 | Swiss Climate | A |
| 2019 | not published | 28.27 | 24.96 | +13% | 695 of 1,154 | Swiss Climate | A |
| 2018 | not published | 35.92 | 24.89 | +44% | 785 of 1,044 | Swiss Climate | A |
Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.