Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

PRINCESS SHAHD

IMO: 9392092
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 25,400 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valetta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.26 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: WAAL CONFIDENCE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Logan Ship Management Co

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 20,274 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

69.6

Bulk carrier median 90.8 kg/nm (−23%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.71 (+24%)

Average speed

12.3 kn

Bulk carrier median 11.1 kn (+11%)

Fuel per day at sea

20.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,220 t

CO₂ emitted

3,853 t

Distance sailed

17,530 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,429 h

60 days, 16% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 74.6 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−10%)

61.0Ranks 1,181 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 10.8 kn · median 10.7 (+1%)

8.8Faster than 57% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.20 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+16%)

4.80Ranks 2,351 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports39%
From the EU34%
Into the EU22%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

184 t

4.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PRINCESS SHAHD
Bulk carrier median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PRINCESS SHAHD
Bulk carrier median

10.010.511.011.512.012.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PRINCESS SHAHD
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.1 kn	+16%	+6%	−25%	−15%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	−4%	−8%	+44%	+51%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−3%	−3%	−58%	−34%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.8 kn	−15%	−10%	−31%	−27%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	−4%	+2%	+151%	+73%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	+12%	+13%	−59%	−22%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	−10%	−12%	+102%	+15%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Logan Ship Management Co	594	1,861	7,964	736	10.8	74.6	9.20	–
2024	Logan Ship Management Co	686	2,155	10,663	898	11.9	64.3	10.8	–
2023	not published	499	1,578	7,407	603	12.3	67.3	7.16	–
2022	not published	1,220	3,853	17,530	1,429	12.3	69.6	10.8	–
2021	not published	2,085	6,599	25,343	2,202	11.5	82.3	14.9	–
2020	not published	865	2,734	10,090	931	10.8	85.7	8.64	–
2019	not published	1,875	5,879	24,518	2,269	10.8	76.5	11.1	–
2018	not published	1,036	3,245	12,128	1,107	11.0	85.4	9.64	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Logan Ship Management Co	9.20	7.90	+16%	2,351 of 3,611	ClassNK	A
2024	Logan Ship Management Co	10.8	8.09	+33%	2,289 of 3,089	EMICERT	A
2023	not published	7.14	20.7	−65%	80 of 1,045	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	10.8	8.71	+24%	2,722 of 3,968	ICS Verification Services	A
2021	not published	14.9	8.57	+74%	3,092 of 3,466	ClassNK	A
2020	not published	8.64	8.24	+5%	1,723 of 3,150	ClassNK	A
2019	not published	11.1	8.38	+33%	2,517 of 3,360	ClassNK	A
2018	not published	9.64	8.50	+13%	2,091 of 3,384	EMICERT	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.