Navalyze · Container · Ship

MAERSK BALI

IMO: 9394870
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 25,443 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.10 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 19,334 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

161

Container median 178 kg/nm (−9%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

22.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (+17%)

Average speed

14.7 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+8%)

Fuel per day at sea

56.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,008 t

CO₂ emitted

29,534 t

Distance sailed

68,410 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,639 h

193 days, 53% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 147 kg/nm · median 177 (−17%)

78.8Ranks 903 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.9 kn · median 13.3 (+5%)

9.1Faster than 58% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+11%)

7.22Ranks 1,230 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports6%
From the EU45%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

10,854 t

99% of all fuel; 1% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

496 t

1.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MAERSK BALI
Container median

120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

MAERSK BALI
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MAERSK BALI
Container median

16.018.020.022.024.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	−0.2 kn	+10%	+8%	−89%	−11%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	−17%	−21%	−46%	−9%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.8 kn	−5%	−15%	+77%	+12%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	+10%	+11%	−45%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.0 kn	+25%	+52%	+97%	+12%	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	−12%	−12%	−10%	−12%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	600	1,884	4,092	295	13.9	147	18.1	96%
2023	not published	4,957	15,522	37,194	2,636	14.1	133	20.4	92%
2022LNG / alt.	not published	11,008	29,534	68,410	4,639	14.7	161	22.3	99%
2021	not published	6,572	20,601	38,693	2,346	16.5	170	20.0	–
2020	not published	10,793	33,764	69,764	4,260	16.4	155	19.8	100%
2019	not published	4,402	13,764	35,493	2,649	13.4	124	17.6	100%
2018	not published	5,522	17,203	39,302	2,926	13.4	141	20.1	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	18.1	16.3	+11%	1,230 of 2,208	ABS	C
2023	not published	20.4	19.4	+5%	1,005 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	22.3	19.1	+17%	1,051 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	20.0	17.9	+12%	994 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	19.8	17.6	+13%	1,017 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	17.6	18.9	−7%	821 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	20.1	20.2	−1%	846 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.