Navalyze · Container · Ship

ONE HAMBURG

IMO: 9395159
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 58,198 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.10 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Oil blended with biofuel or another alternative fuel

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: "K" LINE SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD · part of K Line

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 70,745 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

243

Container median 165 kg/nm (+47%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−44%)

Average speed

16.6 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (+26%)

Fuel per day at sea

96.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,860 t

CO₂ emitted

40,534 t

Distance sailed

52,856 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,192 h

133 days, 36% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 215 kg/nm · median 177 (+21%)

78.8Ranks 1,371 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.2 kn · median 13.3 (+7%)

9.1Faster than 64% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−30%)

7.22Ranks 731 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU46%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

944 t

2.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ONE HAMBURG
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ONE HAMBURG
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ONE HAMBURG
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.6 kn	−9%	−13%	+52%	–	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−1.8 kn	−3%	−13%	−26%	–	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	−6%	−10%	+49%	−3%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.1 kn	−3%	−2%	−33%	−9%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	+4%	+2%	+28%	+13%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	−1%	−0%	+58%	−9%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-yearBio blend	"K" LINE SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD	7,774	23,951	34,552	2,427	14.2	225	11.7	–
2025Bio blend	ONESEA SOLUTIONS PTE LTD	12,707	39,218	59,164	4,172	14.2	215	11.4	38%
2024	"K" LINE SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD	9,181	28,760	38,921	2,632	14.8	236	–	–
2023	not published	12,860	40,534	52,856	3,192	16.6	243	10.8	–
2022	not published	9,185	28,944	35,497	2,049	17.3	259	11.1	–
2021	not published	14,113	44,472	53,000	3,087	17.2	266	12.3	–
2020	not published	10,636	33,516	41,365	2,369	17.5	257	10.9	–
2019	not published	6,780	21,191	26,167	1,510	17.3	259	12.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-yearBio blend	"K" LINE SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	B+C
2025Bio blend	ONESEA SOLUTIONS PTE LTD	11.4	16.3	−30%	731 of 2,208	ClassNK	B+C
2024	"K" LINE SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	B+C
2023	not published	10.8	19.4	−44%	448 of 1,899	ClassNK	B+C
2022	not published	11.1	19.1	−42%	416 of 1,825	ClassNK	B+C
2021	not published	12.3	17.9	−32%	484 of 1,781	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	10.9	17.6	−38%	433 of 1,797	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	12.0	18.9	−36%	445 of 1,788	ClassNK	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.