Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

JUTLANDIA SEA

IMO: 9395355
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 2,044 t
Flag (estimated): Sweden
Port of registry: Stockholm
Technical efficiency: EEXI 15.00 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Fuel (estimated): Oil blended with biofuel or another alternative fuel
Former names: JUTLANDIA SEAWAYS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: AdMare Ship Management AB

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,313 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

140

Ro-ro median 107 kg/nm (+30%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

190

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 109 (+75%)

Average speed

13.4 kn

Ro-ro median 14.6 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

44.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

8,249 t

CO₂ emitted

26,033 t

Distance sailed

59,109 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,408 h

184 days, 50% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 129 kg/nm · median 105 (+24%)

56.6Ranks 174 of 235, lowest first145

Average speedThis ship 13.5 kn · median 14.4 (−6%)

10.9Faster than 34% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 195 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.2 (+105%)

47.4Ranks 181 of 235, lowest first297

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU46%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

7,779 t

94% of all fuel; 6% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,515 t

5.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

JUTLANDIA SEA
Ro-ro median

100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

JUTLANDIA SEA
Ro-ro median

13.013.514.014.515.015.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

JUTLANDIA SEA
Ro-ro median

50.0100150200

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.0 kn	−11%	−17%	−7%	+38%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+1.1 kn	+4%	+12%	−0%	−26%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.9 kn	−11%	−22%	+1%	+21%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.3 kn	+25%	+37%	−32%	+134%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 25%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	−13%	−12%	+338%	−59%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	+3%	+2%	−76%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	−4%	−9%	−9%	+18%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025Bio blend	AdMare Ship Management AB	7,050	21,754	54,574	4,054	13.5	129	195	–
2024Alt. fuel	AdMare Ship Management AB	8,513	24,188	58,886	4,054	14.5	145	142	95%
2023	not published	8,249	26,033	59,109	4,408	13.4	140	190	94%
2022	not published	9,161	28,900	58,273	3,806	15.3	157	158	95%
2021	not published	10,792	33,735	85,929	6,124	14.0	126	67.3	–
2020	not published	2,848	9,085	19,617	1,425	13.8	145	163	–
2019	not published	11,326	35,766	80,299	5,786	13.9	141	155	–
2018	not published	12,914	40,775	88,289	6,022	14.7	146	131	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025Bio blend	AdMare Ship Management AB	195	95.2	+105%	181 of 235	DNV	C
2024Alt. fuel	AdMare Ship Management AB	142	97.5	+45%	149 of 220	ABS	B
2023	not published	190	109	+75%	166 of 221	ABS	B
2022	not published	158	90.6	+74%	167 of 223	ABS	B
2021	not published	67.3	104	−35%	55 of 219	Lloyd's Register	B
2020	not published	163	103	+59%	166 of 238	Lloyd's Register	B
2019	not published	155	90.9	+71%	203 of 271	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	131	91.0	+44%	177 of 260	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.