Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

AL MAYEDA

IMO
9397298
Type
LNG carrier
Flag (estimated)
Marshall Islands
Port of registry
Majuro, Marshall Islands
Technical efficiency
EIV 11.19 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
410
LNG carrier median 308 kg/nm (+33%)
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
9.74
g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.9 (−10%)
Average speed
14.6 kn
LNG carrier median 13.5 kn (+8%)
Fuel per day at sea
143.7 t/day
Fuel consumed
15,760 t
CO₂ emitted
48,936 t
Distance sailed
38,446 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,632 h
110 days, 30% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2022

Set against all 379 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 444 kg/nm · median 252 (+76%)
174Ranks 364 of 379, lowest first380
Average speedThis ship 14.9 kn · median 14.1 (+6%)
10.2Faster than 67% of LNG carrier ships15.9
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 11.7 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 10.4 (+12%)
5.96Ranks 229 of 379, lowest first26.4
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU47%
  • Into the EU51%
  • At berth in the EU3%
Fuel burned laden
8,069 t
51% of all fuel; 49% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
1,238 t
2.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • AL MAYEDA
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • AL MAYEDA
  • LNG carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

  • AL MAYEDA
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2019→2022+0.3 kn+8%+10%−51%+20%0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019+0.0 kn−7%−7%+208%−8%Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2022not published8,40126,50118,9261,27414.9444–59%
2019not published15,76048,93638,4462,63214.6410–51%
2018not published5,53017,22512,48385714.6443–51%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2022not published11.710.4+12%229 of 379ABSC
2019not published9.7410.9−10%90 of 248Lloyd's RegisterB
2018not published10.610.9−3%88 of 197Lloyd's RegisterB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.