Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

AL KHARAITIYAT

IMO: 9397327
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.32 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Nakilat Shipping Qatar Ltd

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

367

LNG carrier median 252 kg/nm (+45%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

13.6

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.4 (+31%)

Average speed

15.8 kn

LNG carrier median 14.1 kn (+12%)

Fuel per day at sea

139.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

19,707 t

CO₂ emitted

62,189 t

Distance sailed

53,770 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,394 h

141 days, 39% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 284 kg/nm · median 190 (+49%)

152Ranks 309 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 14.9 kn · median 14.4 (+3%)

11.2Faster than 65% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 8.35 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+17%)

5.06Ranks 239 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU45%
Into the EU53%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

10,366 t

53% of all fuel; 47% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,393 t

2.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AL KHARAITIYAT
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AL KHARAITIYAT
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

AL KHARAITIYAT
LNG carrier median

5.07.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	−1%	−3%	+100%	−0%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+2.2 kn	−26%	−14%	+48%	−41%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.7 kn	+6%	−12%	−38%	+4%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.0 kn	+10%	+18%	+99%	−16%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.5 kn	−3%	−6%	+23%	+57%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+4.4 kn	−1%	+39%	−8%	−15%	4.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.9 kn	−6%	−21%	−39%	+11%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Nakilat Shipping Qatar Ltd	27,860	86,815	97,978	6,555	14.9	284	–	–
2024	Nakilat Shipping Qatar Ltd	13,991	43,586	48,916	3,200	15.3	286	–	–
2023	not published	12,821	40,435	33,087	2,521	13.1	388	–	42%
2022	not published	19,707	62,189	53,770	3,394	15.8	367	–	53%
2021	not published	9,048	28,598	27,071	1,831	14.8	334	–	–
2020	not published	7,597	23,965	22,050	1,439	15.3	345	–	–
2019	not published	8,327	25,930	23,868	2,199	10.9	349	–	50%
2018	not published	14,530	45,167	38,973	3,033	12.8	373	–	52%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Nakilat Shipping Qatar Ltd	8.35	7.12	+17%	239 of 386	DNV	B+C
2024	Nakilat Shipping Qatar Ltd	8.36	7.39	+13%	183 of 312	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	14.2	9.10	+56%	305 of 355	ABS	A+B
2022	not published	13.6	10.4	+31%	274 of 379	ABS	C
2021	not published	16.1	10.5	+54%	244 of 289	ABS	C
2020	not published	10.2	10.7	−4%	122 of 267	ABS	C
2019	not published	12.1	10.9	+11%	156 of 248	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	10.9	10.9	+0%	100 of 197	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.