Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

AL REKAYYAT

IMO: 9397339
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.32 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Nakilat Shipping Qatar Ltd

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

409

LNG carrier median 308 kg/nm (+33%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

12.0

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.9 (+10%)

Average speed

8.7 kn

LNG carrier median 13.5 kn (−36%)

Fuel per day at sea

85.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,012 t

CO₂ emitted

43,633 t

Distance sailed

34,281 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,942 h

164 days, 45% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 306 kg/nm · median 190 (+61%)

152Ranks 333 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 14.9 kn · median 14.4 (+3%)

11.2Faster than 61% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 8.00 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+12%)

5.06Ranks 229 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU52%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

6,544 t

47% of all fuel; 53% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

585 t

1.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AL REKAYYAT
LNG carrier median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

AL REKAYYAT
LNG carrier median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

AL REKAYYAT
LNG carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	−0.1 kn	−18%	−19%	+65%	−23%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.6 kn	+7%	−4%	+45%	−17%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2022	+0.7 kn	+14%	+19%	+121%	−10%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+7.2 kn	−25%	+37%	−64%	+15%	7.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−4.3 kn	+6%	−29%	+263%	+7%	4.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Nakilat Shipping Qatar Ltd	19,959	61,944	65,207	4,389	14.9	306	–	–
2023	not published	14,809	46,679	39,559	2,640	15.0	374	–	54%
2022	not published	9,543	30,140	27,240	1,638	16.6	350	–	51%
2020	not published	3,795	11,965	12,329	777	15.9	308	–	–
2019	not published	14,012	43,633	34,281	3,942	8.7	409	–	47%
2018	not published	3,642	11,234	9,440	726	13.0	386	–	51%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Nakilat Shipping Qatar Ltd	8.00	7.12	+12%	229 of 386	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	10.3	9.10	+14%	213 of 355	ABS	A+B
2022	not published	12.5	10.4	+20%	253 of 379	ABS	C
2020	not published	13.8	10.7	+29%	202 of 267	ABS	C
2019	not published	12.0	10.9	+10%	152 of 248	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	11.3	10.9	+3%	109 of 197	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.