Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

AL SADD

IMO: 9397341
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro, Marshall Islands
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.13 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

360

LNG carrier median 231 kg/nm (+56%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

9.79

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (+8%)

Average speed

15.1 kn

LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

130.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,247 t

CO₂ emitted

35,452 t

Distance sailed

31,223 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,062 h

86 days, 24% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 360 kg/nm · median 231 (+56%)

167Ranks 321 of 355, lowest first359

Average speedThis ship 15.1 kn · median 14.2 (+6%)

10.7Faster than 75% of LNG carrier ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 9.79 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (+8%)

5.47Ranks 197 of 355, lowest first17.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU41%
Into the EU56%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

6,287 t

56% of all fuel; 44% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,124 t

3.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AL SADD
LNG carrier median

200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

AL SADD
LNG carrier median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

AL SADD
LNG carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2023	−1.3 kn	+7%	−1%	−13%	−25%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.3 kn	−0%	+1%	+42%	+24%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	−3%	−2%	−62%	+10%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+1.3 kn	+7%	+16%	+161%	−4%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.7 kn	+40%	+47%	−22%	+44%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 40%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2023	not published	11,247	35,452	31,223	2,062	15.1	360	–	56%
2022	not published	12,121	38,268	36,002	2,201	16.4	337	–	51%
2021	not published	8,598	27,135	25,419	1,575	16.1	338	–	–
2020	not published	23,094	72,880	66,241	4,132	16.0	349	–	–
2019	not published	8,313	25,920	25,401	1,730	14.7	327	–	52%
2018	not published	7,576	23,593	32,383	2,318	14.0	234	–	43%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023	not published	9.79	9.10	+8%	197 of 355	ABS	A+B
2022	not published	13.0	10.4	+25%	260 of 379	ABS	C
2021	not published	10.4	10.5	−0%	143 of 289	ABS	C
2020	not published	9.49	10.7	−11%	99 of 267	ABS	C
2019	not published	9.89	10.9	−9%	95 of 248	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	6.87	10.9	−37%	31 of 197	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.