Navalyze · Con-ro · Ship

SUPER-FAST BALEARES

IMO: 9398527
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 329 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 16.20 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SUPER FAST BALEARES

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: ACCIONA LOGISTICA, S.A.

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,287 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

245

Ro-ro median 107 kg/nm (+128%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

233

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 90.9 (+156%)

Average speed

16.8 kn

Ro-ro median 14.8 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

98.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,714 t

CO₂ emitted

36,541 t

Distance sailed

47,806 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,849 h

119 days, 33% of the year

Within the con-ro fleet, 2024

Set against all 64 con-ro ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 230 kg/nm · median 136 (+69%)

92.3Ranks 64 of 64, lowest first168

Average speedThis ship 13.0 kn · median 14.4 (−10%)

12.1Faster than 19% of con-ro ships15.2

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 128 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.36 (+1,269%)

5.45Ranks 64 of 64, lowest first45.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Con-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports30%
From the EU31%
Into the EU32%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,408 t

6.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SUPER-FAST BALEARES
Ro-ro median

100.0150.0200.0250.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

SUPER-FAST BALEARES
Ro-ro median

12.014.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SUPER-FAST BALEARES
Ro-ro median

0.0200400600800

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	−1.9 kn	+6%	−8%	−64%	−82%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−5.9 kn	−8%	−34%	−28%	+264%	5.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+5%	+5%	−12%	−10%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+2.2 kn	−5%	+7%	+245%	+36%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.8 kn	−4%	+6%	−23%	−33%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	+6%	+1%	−46%	+21%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024part-year	ACCIONA LOGISTICA, S.A.	3,443	10,756	16,522	1,289	12.8	208	1,143	56%
2024	GFS Ship Management FZE	6,577	20,565	28,613	2,200	13.0	230	2,186	30%
2023	not published	17,473	54,474	80,331	5,399	14.9	218	702	80%
2022	not published	26,398	82,240	112,196	5,400	20.8	235	193	98%
2021	not published	28,617	89,143	127,722	6,129	20.8	224	214	–
2020	not published	8,702	27,153	36,989	1,988	18.6	235	157	–
2019	not published	11,714	36,541	47,806	2,849	16.8	245	233	–
2018	not published	20,433	63,727	87,999	5,011	17.6	232	193	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	Con-ro median	vs Con-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024part-year	ACCIONA LOGISTICA, S.A.	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	B
2024	GFS Ship Management FZE	128	9.36	+1,269%	64 of 64	DNV	A+B+C
2023	not published	702	109	+546%	215 of 221	Bureau Veritas	C
2022	not published	193	90.6	+113%	181 of 223	Bureau Veritas	C
2021	not published	214	104	+106%	176 of 219	Bureau Veritas	C
2020	not published	157	103	+52%	164 of 238	Bureau Veritas	C
2019	not published	233	90.9	+156%	233 of 271	Bureau Veritas	C
2018	not published	193	91.0	+112%	214 of 260	Bureau Veritas	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Con-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's con-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.