Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

EAGLE HANOVER

IMO: 9398723
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 23,183 t
Flag (estimated): Isle of Man
Port of registry: Douglas
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.68 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MISC Shipmanagement (S) Pte Ltd · part of MISC

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 69,611 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

165

Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (+28%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.53

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.86 (−15%)

Average speed

9.6 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−10%)

Fuel per day at sea

38.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,444 t

CO₂ emitted

10,919 t

Distance sailed

20,832 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,160 h

90 days, 25% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 147 kg/nm · median 129 (+15%)

76.1Ranks 1,132 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 10.7 (+5%)

8.0Faster than 64% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 19.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+149%)

4.51Ranks 1,385 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports6%
From the EU29%
Into the EU53%
At berth in the EU13%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,389 t

12.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EAGLE HANOVER
Oil tanker median

120.0140.0160.0180.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EAGLE HANOVER
Oil tanker median

7.08.09.010.011.012.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EAGLE HANOVER
Oil tanker median

0.025.050.075.0100

’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+17%	+17%	−31%	+111%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	+2%	−1%	−33%	–	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+2.4 kn	−19%	+3%	+203%	–	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	−8%	−13%	−73%	+1,110%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+1.9 kn	+5%	+32%	−23%	−36%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MISC Shipmanagement (S) Pte Ltd	1,141	3,548	7,742	692	11.2	147	19.8	32%
2024	MISC Shipmanagement (S) Pte Ltd	1,408	4,429	11,212	999	11.2	126	9.35	48%
2023	not published	2,069	6,536	16,806	1,456	11.5	123	–	35%
2022	not published	845	2,644	5,553	610	9.1	152	91.1	–
2021	not published	3,444	10,919	20,832	2,160	9.6	165	7.53	–
2020	not published	4,252	13,565	27,048	3,523	7.7	157	11.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MISC Shipmanagement (S) Pte Ltd	19.8	7.95	+149%	1,385 of 1,665	ABS	C
2024	MISC Shipmanagement (S) Pte Ltd	9.35	8.06	+16%	1,085 of 1,787	ABS	C
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	ABS	–
2022	not published	91.1	8.51	+971%	1,951 of 1,961	DNV	C
2021	not published	7.53	8.86	−15%	680 of 1,789	DNV	C
2020	not published	11.8	9.03	+31%	1,234 of 1,870	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.