Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- MISCyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| MISC | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 24 |
| CO₂ emitted | 238 kt+2.0% |
| Fuel per mile | 152 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 10.7 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 7.1% |
| Ships burning LNG | 2 |
| Main segment | Oil tanker |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0
- MISC6.5 (−18% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MISC | 22 | 6.5 | −18% | 152 | 10.4 | 2,004 | 7.6% | – |
| Segment median | 8.0 | 0% |
LNG carrier
CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.1
- MISC60.0 (+743% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MISC | 2 | 60.0 | +743% | 149 | 14.3 | 1,884 | 2.1% | 2 |
| Segment median | 7.1 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MISC | ABS (24) | 0% | 8% | 100% | 0% |
MISC: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVENIR ADVANTAGELNG | 9830898 | LNG carrier | 115 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +1514% | 13.5 | 346 t | €9k |
| EAGLE HANOVER | 9398723 | Oil tanker | 19.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.4 | +90% | 11.2 | 3,548 t | €88k |
| EAGLE PETROLINA | 9858553 | Oil tanker | 11.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | +75% | 8.1 | 7,165 t | €188k |
| EAGLE PARAISO | 9858577 | Oil tanker | 10.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | +74% | 7.8 | 7,016 t | €190k |
| EAGLE HAMILTON | 9426207 | Oil tanker | 10.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +32% | 7.9 | 6,258 t | €180k |
| EAGLE PAULINIA | 9858565 | Oil tanker | 10.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +26% | 8.4 | 6,266 t | €165k |
| EAGLE VALLERY | 9910246 | Oil tanker | 5.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.6 | +22% | 10.4 | 9,219 t | €313k |
| EAGLE VENTURA | 9933614 | Oil tanker | 9.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +11% | 10.0 | 8,877 t | €243k |
| EAGLE KLANG | 9417892 | Oil tanker | 9.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +10% | 11.1 | 8,048 t | €220k |
| EAGLE BARCELONA | 9795048 | Oil tanker | 11.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.4 | +6% | 10.8 | 6,410 t | €197k |
| EAGLE VERSAILLES | 9597276 | Oil tanker | 4.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.6 | +1% | 10.6 | 5,874 t | €173k |
| EAGLE BRASILIA | 9795062 | Oil tanker | 8.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | −1% | 10.2 | 21,614 t | €686k |
| EAGLE VICTORIA | 9739513 | Oil tanker | 4.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.6 | −1% | 11.3 | 19,111 t | €570k |
| EAGLE SAN JUAN | 9594846 | Oil tanker | 6.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | −2% | 11.4 | 7,327 t | €205k |
| EAGLE SAN FRANCISCO | 9795127 | Oil tanker | 6.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | −5% | 10.0 | 8,568 t | €236k |
| EAGLE SAN ANTONIO | 9594822 | Oil tanker | 6.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | −5% | 11.4 | 7,942 t | €220k |
| EAGLE BINTULU | 9795074 | Oil tanker | 7.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | −6% | 10.2 | 23,198 t | €822k |
| EAGLE SAN JOSE | 9795139 | Oil tanker | 5.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | −12% | 12.3 | 3,886 t | €108k |
| EAGLE SAN DIEGO | 9594834 | Oil tanker | 5.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | −15% | 10.2 | 11,724 t | €327k |
| EAGLE KUANTAN | 9417012 | Oil tanker | 6.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | −16% | 10.5 | 8,410 t | €248k |
| EAGLE VENICE | 9728710 | Oil tanker | 3.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.6 | −18% | 11.0 | 16,810 t | €469k |
| SERI DAYALNG | 9896452 | LNG carrier | 5.2 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | −28% | 14.4 | 21,617 t | €580k |
| EAGLE SAN PEDRO | 9594858 | Oil tanker | 3.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.6 | −31% | 12.6 | 464 t | €12k |
| EAGLE VELLORE | 9933602 | Oil tanker | 2.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.6 | −41% | 12.1 | 18,034 t | €503k |
30 of 24 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.