Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

CIUDAD DE MAHON

IMO
9398890
Type
Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated)
Spain
Port of registry
Santa Cruz De Tenerife
Technical efficiency
EEXI 30.96 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
VOLCAN DE TIJARAFE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA

?
?

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
187
Ro-pax median 158 kg/nm (+18%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
5,527
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 729 (+658%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
1,371
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 184 (+645%)
Average speed
18.8 kn
Ro-pax median 16.1 kn (+17%)
Fuel per day at sea
84.5 t/day
Fuel consumed
13,852 t
CO₂ emitted
43,172 t
Distance sailed
74,064 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,936 h
164 days, 45% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 165 kg/nm · median 150 (+10%)
69.3Ranks 255 of 408, lowest first232
Average speedThis ship 13.3 kn · median 15.8 (−16%)
12.0Faster than 22% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 705 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+24%)
66.8Ranks 235 of 408, lowest first1,569
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 640 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+153%)
48.6Ranks 296 of 408, lowest first1,247
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports86%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU14%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
5,863 t
13.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • CIUDAD DE MAHON
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • CIUDAD DE MAHON
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • CIUDAD DE MAHON
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • CIUDAD DE MAHON
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−3.2 kn+7%−13%−43%−1%3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024−0.7 kn−4%−8%+4%+32%0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023−0.9 kn−3%−8%+20%+105%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022−0.4 kn+1%−2%−5%−53%0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+0.8 kn−7%−3%+112%−15%0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020−0.6 kn+4%+1%−61%−50%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019−0.5 kn−9%−12%+17%−76%0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA7,81024,44147,4613,57113.3165––
2024part-yearTRASMED GLE SL UNIPERSONAL1,8815,87212,08074416.2156––
2024Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA12,88040,20183,9655,10116.5153––
2023not published12,94640,41180,7784,69917.2160––
2022not published11,15434,81567,4343,73518.1165––
2021not published11,69936,52971,2773,85218.5164––
2020not published5,90918,49533,5861,89217.7176––
2019not published14,74645,99987,0144,76318.3170––
2018not published13,85243,17274,0643,93618.8187––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA705567+24%235 of 408640253+153%RINAA+B
2024part-yearTRASMED GLE SL UNIPERSONAL–––––––RINAA
2024Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA710547+30%241 of 40443.0233−82%RINAA+B
2023not published538680−21%161 of 386527234+125%RINAA
2022not published263626−58%117 of 394608253+140%RINAA
2021not published563815−31%159 of 377664226+194%RINAB
2020not published666751−11%182 of 387569217+161%Bureau VeritasA+B
2019not published1,330569+134%328 of 3941,330223+498%Bureau VeritasA+B
2018not published5,527729+658%348 of 3611,371184+645%Bureau VeritasA+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.