Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

NCC HUDA

IMO: 9399272
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 31,159 t
Flag (estimated): Saudi Arabia
Port of registry: Dammam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.20 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Bahri Ship Management DMCC

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 28,464 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

127

Chemical tanker median 85.7 kg/nm (+48%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

14.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.2 (−13%)

Average speed

9.1 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.4 kn (−20%)

Fuel per day at sea

27.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,597 t

CO₂ emitted

5,017 t

Distance sailed

12,580 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,388 h

58 days, 16% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 114 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+43%)

52.8Ranks 1,337 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 12.6 kn · median 11.1 (+14%)

8.8Faster than 93% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (−24%)

7.93Ranks 450 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports27%
From the EU23%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

308 t

6.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NCC HUDA
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NCC HUDA
Chemical tanker median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NCC HUDA
Chemical tanker median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	+6%	+5%	−7%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	+12%	+12%	+5%	+29%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	−10%	−10%	+69%	+10%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	−11%	−14%	+43%	−29%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+4.1 kn	−6%	+37%	−22%	−15%	4.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2020	+2.4 kn	+16%	+58%	+179%	−35%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	2,623	8,193	23,066	1,828	12.6	114	11.4	83%
2024	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	2,662	8,328	24,803	1,951	12.7	107	12.0	70%
2023	not published	2,255	7,065	23,637	1,849	12.8	95.4	9.30	77%
2022	not published	1,489	4,665	14,027	1,101	12.7	106	8.46	91%
2021	not published	1,174	3,671	9,816	746	13.2	120	11.9	82%
2020	not published	1,597	5,017	12,580	1,388	9.1	127	14.0	–
2018	not published	493	1,540	4,516	677	6.7	109	21.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	11.4	15.0	−24%	450 of 1,460	ABS	B+C
2024	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	12.0	16.7	−28%	395 of 1,274	ABS	B+C
2023	not published	9.30	16.2	−43%	148 of 1,314	ABS	C
2022	not published	8.46	16.1	−47%	101 of 1,409	ABS	C
2021	not published	11.9	16.7	−28%	322 of 1,343	ABS	C
2020	not published	14.0	16.2	−13%	488 of 1,312	ABS	C
2018	not published	21.7	17.1	+26%	863 of 1,294	Lloyd's Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.