Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

VERIGE

IMO: 9401128
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 28,835 t
Flag (estimated): Croatia
Port of registry: Pula
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.84 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IB

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ASP SHIP MANAGEMENT SINGAPORE PTE LTD

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 36,347 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

111

Chemical tanker median 81.9 kg/nm (+36%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.65

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.2 (−41%)

Average speed

11.0 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.2 kn (−2%)

Fuel per day at sea

29.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,866 t

CO₂ emitted

5,880 t

Distance sailed

16,765 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,529 h

64 days, 17% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 114 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+43%)

52.8Ranks 1,345 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 12.1 kn · median 11.1 (+9%)

8.8Faster than 83% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (−17%)

7.93Ranks 542 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU23%
Into the EU63%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

412 t

7.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

VERIGE
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

VERIGE
Chemical tanker median

8.09.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

VERIGE
Chemical tanker median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.6 kn	−5%	−0%	+20%	+26%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	+8%	+13%	+3%	+3%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.5 kn	+6%	+11%	−58%	−41%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	−9%	−13%	+14%	+40%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	+10%	+7%	−19%	−21%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.4 kn	−5%	+21%	+139%	+52%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	−7%	−6%	−43%	−29%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	ASP SHIP MANAGEMENT SINGAPORE PTE LTD	2,371	7,464	20,774	1,717	12.1	114	12.5	–
2024	ASP SHIP MANAGEMENT SINGAPORE PTE LTD	2,082	6,520	17,265	1,506	11.5	121	9.92	–
2023	not published	1,866	5,880	16,765	1,529	11.0	111	9.65	–
2022	not published	4,226	13,460	40,360	3,826	10.5	105	16.3	–
2021	not published	4,081	12,856	35,526	3,196	11.1	115	11.6	–
2020	not published	4,582	14,345	43,744	3,861	11.3	105	14.7	–
2019	not published	2,018	6,337	18,265	2,050	8.9	111	9.70	–
2018	not published	3,816	11,961	31,980	3,634	8.8	119	13.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	ASP SHIP MANAGEMENT SINGAPORE PTE LTD	12.5	15.0	−17%	542 of 1,460	DNV	A+C
2024	ASP SHIP MANAGEMENT SINGAPORE PTE LTD	9.92	16.7	−41%	238 of 1,274	DNV	A
2023	not published	9.65	16.2	−41%	180 of 1,314	DNV	A
2022	not published	16.3	16.1	+1%	716 of 1,409	DNV	A
2021	not published	11.6	16.7	−30%	304 of 1,343	DNV	A
2020	not published	14.7	16.2	−9%	548 of 1,312	DNV	A
2019	not published	9.70	17.3	−44%	160 of 1,321	DNV	A
2018	not published	13.8	17.1	−20%	431 of 1,294	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.