Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

NAVIGATOR VESTA

IMO: 9402574
Type: Gas carrier
Average cargo carried: 6,010 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EIV 14.62 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: GASCHEM PACIFIC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Navigator Gas Ship Management (Denmark) ApS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,010 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

81.5 kg/nm

Gas carrier (LPG) median 81.5 kg/nm (+0%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

42.64

g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 35.56 (+20%)

Average speed

13.3 kn

Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.6 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

26.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,521 t

CO₂ emitted

7,921 t

8,045 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

30,911 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,320 h

97 days, 26% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 81.5 kg/nm · median 81.5 (+0%)

49.8Ranks 179 of 355, lowest first124.4

Average speedThis ship 13.3 kn · median 12.6 (+6%)

8.8Faster than 63% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 42.64 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.56 (+20%)

14.36Ranks 203 of 355, lowest first120.18

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU40%
Into the EU56%
At berth in the EU2%

52% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,097 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

NAVIGATOR VESTA
Gas carrier (LPG) median

80.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

NAVIGATOR VESTA
Gas carrier (LPG) median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NAVIGATOR VESTA
Gas carrier (LPG) median

20.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2025	+1.6 kn	−21%	−10%	+38%	−56%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	+8%	+16%	−45%	+68%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.4 kn	+1%	−24%	−14%	+13%	3.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.3 kn	+4%	−4%	+39%	−19%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.6 kn	+5%	+16%	+77%	+13%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.9 kn	−24%	−33%	−75%	−25%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 24%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Navigator Gas Ship Management (Denmark) ApS	2,521	7,921	30,911	2,320	13.3	81.5	42.64	–
2023	not published	2,315	7,333	22,432	1,921	11.7	103.2	97.85	–
2022	not published	3,868	12,248	40,498	3,720	10.9	95.5	58.26	–
2021	not published	4,481	14,167	47,232	3,293	14.3	94.9	51.34	–
2020	not published	3,088	9,743	33,913	2,177	15.6	91.1	63.57	–
2019	not published	1,662	5,180	19,111	1,368	14.0	87.0	56.39	–
2018	not published	8,904	27,753	77,864	4,884	15.9	114.3	74.94	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Gas carrier (LPG) median	vs Gas carrier (LPG)	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Navigator Gas Ship Management (Denmark) ApS	42.64	35.56	+20%	203 of 355	Verifavia	A+C
2023	not published	97.85	41.77	+134%	268 of 330	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–
2022	not published	58.26	42.53	+37%	219 of 348	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	51.34	46.91	+9%	177 of 323	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2020	not published	63.57	42.29	+50%	221 of 339	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2019	not published	56.39	45.85	+23%	190 of 331	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2018	not published	74.94	53.11	+41%	187 of 297	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.