Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

AURIGA LEADER

IMO: 9402718
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 7,621 t
Flag (estimated): Japan
Port of registry: Tokyo
Technical efficiency: EIV 17.06 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Oil blended with biofuel or another alternative fuel

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD · part of NYK

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,171 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

99.2

Vehicle carrier median 103 kg/nm (−4%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

38.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 56.6 (−32%)

Average speed

16.3 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.5 kn (+12%)

Fuel per day at sea

38.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,050 t

CO₂ emitted

3,320 t

Distance sailed

10,589 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

648 h

27 days, 7% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 88.9 kg/nm · median 99.9 (−11%)

79.6Ranks 113 of 506, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 14.7 kn · median 14.4 (+2%)

12.0Faster than 59% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 36.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.4 (−35%)

34.7Ranks 62 of 506, lowest first158

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU8%
Into the EU85%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

131 t

3.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AURIGA LEADER
Vehicle carrier median

80.090.0100.0110.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AURIGA LEADER
Vehicle carrier median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AURIGA LEADER
Vehicle carrier median

30.040.050.060.070.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.5 kn	−7%	+3%	+682%	–	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−3.1 kn	−3%	−22%	−74%	–	3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+3.7 kn	−1%	+28%	+53%	−21%	3.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.0 kn	+19%	+3%	−46%	−3%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.6 kn	−2%	+10%	−32%	+29%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.4 kn	−20%	−11%	+108%	−9%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.9 kn	+2%	−24%	−31%	−11%	3.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025Bio blend	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	1,944	6,012	21,857	1,487	14.7	88.9	36.1	–
2024	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	268	839	2,795	211	13.2	95.8	–	–
2023	not published	1,050	3,320	10,589	648	16.3	99.2	38.4	–
2022	not published	694	2,201	6,902	547	12.6	101	48.6	–
2021	not published	1,082	3,418	12,846	882	14.6	84.2	50.3	–
2020	not published	1,617	5,115	18,779	1,448	13.0	86.1	38.9	–
2019	not published	972	3,047	9,020	778	11.6	108	42.8	–
2018	not published	1,373	4,302	13,012	839	15.5	106	48.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025Bio blend	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	36.1	55.4	−35%	62 of 506	ClassNK	B+C
2024	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	38.4	56.6	−32%	42 of 417	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	48.6	57.7	−16%	143 of 463	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	50.3	59.6	−16%	138 of 459	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	38.9	57.3	−32%	42 of 449	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	42.8	59.0	−27%	43 of 426	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	48.1	62.4	−23%	61 of 434	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.