Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

WICKY SPIRIT

IMO: 9404388
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 5,661 t
Flag (estimated): Canada
Port of registry: Toronto
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.70 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TB Marine Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,324 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

65.5

Chemical tanker median 85.7 kg/nm (−24%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

39.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.2 (+144%)

Average speed

10.2 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.4 kn (−11%)

Fuel per day at sea

16.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,282 t

CO₂ emitted

7,318 t

Distance sailed

34,837 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,417 h

142 days, 39% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 64.7 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−19%)

52.8Ranks 372 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 10.7 kn · median 11.1 (−4%)

8.8Faster than 39% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 36.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+144%)

7.93Ranks 1,260 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports10%
From the EU58%
Into the EU29%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

156 t

2.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

WICKY SPIRIT
Chemical tanker median

60.070.080.090.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

WICKY SPIRIT
Chemical tanker median

9.09.510.010.511.011.5

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

WICKY SPIRIT
Chemical tanker median

0.025.050.075.0100125

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+2%	+2%	+31%	−13%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.7 kn	−9%	−3%	+16%	−13%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	−3%	−8%	−20%	−2%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.7 kn	−5%	+1%	−20%	−3%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	+15%	+13%	−31%	+30%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.8 kn	−10%	−3%	+39%	−61%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	TB Marine Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	1,522	4,878	23,512	2,197	10.7	64.7	36.7	–
2024	TB Marine Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	1,132	3,631	17,897	1,666	10.7	63.3	42.4	–
2023	not published	1,076	3,449	15,478	1,541	10.0	69.5	48.5	–
2022	not published	1,374	4,403	19,268	1,798	10.7	71.3	49.7	71%
2021	not published	1,797	5,762	23,941	2,385	10.0	75.1	51.1	66%
2020	not published	2,282	7,318	34,837	3,417	10.2	65.5	39.5	–
2019	not published	1,823	11,633	25,004	2,652	9.4	72.9	102	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	TB Marine Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	36.7	15.0	+144%	1,260 of 1,460	DNV	B+C
2024	TB Marine Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	42.4	16.7	+153%	1,152 of 1,274	DNV	A+B+C
2023	not published	48.5	16.2	+199%	1,223 of 1,314	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	49.7	16.1	+210%	1,340 of 1,409	ABS	B
2021	not published	51.1	16.7	+206%	1,272 of 1,343	ABS	B
2020	not published	39.5	16.2	+144%	1,166 of 1,312	ABS	B
2019	not published	102	17.3	+487%	1,316 of 1,321	ABS	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.