Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM MUSSET

IMO: 9406611
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 52,383 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.16 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Danaos Shipping Co LTD · part of Danaos

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 52,383 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

193.9 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+10%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.57

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−29%)

Average speed

12.4 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

57.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,534 t

CO₂ emitted

29,793 t

30,261 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

49,158 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,962 h

165 days, 45% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 193.9 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+10%)

78.8Ranks 1,241 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 12.4 kn · median 13.3 (−7%)

9.1Faster than 36% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.57 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−29%)

7.22Ranks 753 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports33%
From the EU47%
Into the EU15%
At berth in the EU6%

69% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (20,662 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

6.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.5 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CMA CGM MUSSET
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM MUSSET
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM MUSSET
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−2.6 kn	+8%	−11%	+125%	−19%	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	−15%	−12%	−26%	−5%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.6 kn	−12%	−21%	−54%	−7%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	−8%	−12%	−6%	+0%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+2.6 kn	+30%	+54%	−2%	+19%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 30%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.6 kn	−9%	−18%	+44%	+2%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.2 kn	−11%	−10%	+7%	−20%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Danaos Shipping Co LTD	9,534	29,793	49,158	3,962	12.4	193.9	11.57	–
2024	Danaos Shipping Co LTD	3,930	12,316	21,834	1,454	15.0	180.0	14.23	–
2023	not published	6,248	19,547	29,389	2,032	14.5	212.6	15.00	–
2022	not published	15,521	48,805	64,459	3,999	16.1	240.8	16.11	–
2021	not published	17,998	56,744	68,455	4,090	16.7	262.9	16.04	–
2020	not published	14,105	44,126	69,602	4,933	14.1	202.7	13.52	–
2019	not published	10,691	33,331	48,223	3,071	15.7	221.7	13.25	–
2018	not published	11,207	34,980	45,011	2,895	15.5	249.0	16.52	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Danaos Shipping Co LTD	11.57	16.30	−29%	753 of 2,208	DNV	B
2024	Danaos Shipping Co LTD	14.23	17.52	−19%	778 of 1,974	DNV	B
2023	not published	15.00	19.40	−23%	729 of 1,899	DNV	B
2022	not published	16.11	19.13	−16%	776 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	16.04	17.90	−10%	782 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	13.52	17.58	−23%	620 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	13.25	18.88	−30%	519 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	16.52	20.22	−18%	648 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.