Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM MUSSET

IMO: 9406611
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 52,383 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.16 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Danaos Shipping Co LTD · part of Danaos

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 51,679 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

263

Container median 186 kg/nm (+41%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

16.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (−10%)

Average speed

16.7 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (+18%)

Fuel per day at sea

105.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

17,998 t

CO₂ emitted

56,744 t

Distance sailed

68,455 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,090 h

170 days, 47% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 194 kg/nm · median 177 (+10%)

78.8Ranks 1,241 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.4 kn · median 13.3 (−7%)

9.1Faster than 36% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−29%)

7.22Ranks 753 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU44%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,725 t

3.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM MUSSET
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM MUSSET
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM MUSSET
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.6 kn	+8%	−11%	+125%	−19%	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	−15%	−12%	−26%	−5%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.6 kn	−12%	−21%	−54%	−7%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	−8%	−12%	−6%	+0%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+2.6 kn	+30%	+54%	−2%	+19%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 30%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.6 kn	−9%	−18%	+44%	+2%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.2 kn	−11%	−10%	+7%	−20%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Danaos Shipping Co LTD	9,534	29,793	49,158	3,962	12.4	194	11.6	–
2024	Danaos Shipping Co LTD	3,930	12,316	21,834	1,454	15.0	180	14.2	–
2023	not published	6,248	19,547	29,389	2,032	14.5	213	15.0	–
2022	not published	15,521	48,805	64,459	3,999	16.1	241	16.1	–
2021	not published	17,998	56,744	68,455	4,090	16.7	263	16.0	–
2020	not published	14,105	44,126	69,602	4,933	14.1	203	13.5	–
2019	not published	10,691	33,331	48,223	3,071	15.7	222	13.3	–
2018	not published	11,207	34,980	45,011	2,895	15.5	249	16.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Danaos Shipping Co LTD	11.6	16.3	−29%	753 of 2,208	DNV	B
2024	Danaos Shipping Co LTD	14.2	17.5	−19%	778 of 1,974	DNV	B
2023	not published	15.0	19.4	−23%	729 of 1,899	DNV	B
2022	not published	16.1	19.1	−16%	776 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	16.0	17.9	−10%	782 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	13.5	17.6	−23%	620 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	13.3	18.9	−30%	519 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	16.5	20.2	−18%	648 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.