Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM LAMARTINE

IMO: 9409194
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 53,105 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.20 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM SA · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 53,105 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

206.2 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+16%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

12.15

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−25%)

Average speed

11.0 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−17%)

Fuel per day at sea

54.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,980 t

CO₂ emitted

18,716 t

19,009 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

29,006 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,635 h

110 days, 30% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 206.2 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+16%)

78.8Ranks 1,316 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 11.0 kn · median 13.3 (−17%)

9.1Faster than 22% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.15 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−25%)

7.22Ranks 802 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports29%
From the EU55%
Into the EU8%
At berth in the EU8%

68% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (12,796 t).

Fuel burned laden

92%

8% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

7.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CMA CGM LAMARTINE
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM LAMARTINE
Container median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM LAMARTINE
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−3.8 kn	+13%	−16%	−55%	+4%	3.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	+1%	+0%	−3%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	+1.1 kn	−14%	−7%	−8%	−9%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	+8%	+2%	+3%	+10%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.0 kn	−11%	−4%	+186%	−4%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	+2%	+2%	−33%	+17%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−2.3 kn	−3%	−18%	+105%	+6%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	CMA CGM SA	5,980	18,716	29,006	2,635	11.0	206.2	12.15	92%
2024	CMA CGM SA	11,792	36,793	64,402	4,354	14.8	183.1	11.69	96%
2023	not published	12,029	37,609	66,120	4,460	14.8	181.9	12.62	96%
2022	not published	15,175	47,872	71,563	5,238	13.7	212.1	13.90	96%
2021	not published	13,568	42,812	69,250	4,773	14.5	195.9	12.67	97%
2020	not published	5,334	16,837	24,245	1,799	13.5	220.0	13.25	100%
2019	not published	7,846	24,521	36,401	2,704	13.5	215.6	11.37	95%
2018	not published	3,953	12,321	17,761	1,121	15.8	222.6	10.71	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA CGM SA	12.15	16.30	−25%	802 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA CGM SA	11.69	17.52	−33%	582 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	12.62	19.40	−35%	577 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	13.90	19.13	−27%	626 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	12.67	17.90	−29%	518 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	13.25	17.58	−25%	597 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	11.37	18.88	−40%	417 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	10.71	20.22	−47%	305 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.