Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM LAMARTINE

IMO: 9409194
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 53,105 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.20 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM SA · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 48,795 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

196

Container median 186 kg/nm (+5%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

12.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (−29%)

Average speed

14.5 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

68.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,568 t

CO₂ emitted

42,812 t

Distance sailed

69,250 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,773 h

199 days, 54% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 206 kg/nm · median 177 (+16%)

78.8Ranks 1,316 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.0 kn · median 13.3 (−17%)

9.1Faster than 22% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−25%)

7.22Ranks 802 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports8%
From the EU45%
Into the EU43%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

13,134 t

97% of all fuel; 3% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,404 t

3.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM LAMARTINE
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM LAMARTINE
Container median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM LAMARTINE
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−3.8 kn	+13%	−16%	−55%	+4%	3.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	+1%	+0%	−3%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	+1.1 kn	−14%	−7%	−8%	−9%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	+8%	+2%	+3%	+10%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.0 kn	−11%	−4%	+186%	−4%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	+2%	+2%	−33%	+17%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−2.3 kn	−3%	−18%	+105%	+6%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA CGM SA	5,980	18,716	29,006	2,635	11.0	206	12.2	92%
2024	CMA CGM SA	11,792	36,793	64,402	4,354	14.8	183	11.7	96%
2023	not published	12,029	37,609	66,120	4,460	14.8	182	12.6	96%
2022	not published	15,175	47,872	71,563	5,238	13.7	212	13.9	96%
2021	not published	13,568	42,812	69,250	4,773	14.5	196	12.7	97%
2020	not published	5,334	16,837	24,245	1,799	13.5	220	13.3	100%
2019	not published	7,846	24,521	36,401	2,704	13.5	216	11.4	95%
2018	not published	3,953	12,321	17,761	1,121	15.8	223	10.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA CGM SA	12.2	16.3	−25%	802 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA CGM SA	11.7	17.5	−33%	582 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	12.6	19.4	−35%	577 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	13.9	19.1	−27%	626 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	12.7	17.9	−29%	518 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	13.3	17.6	−25%	597 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	11.4	18.9	−40%	417 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	10.7	20.2	−47%	305 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.