Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

G. FOREVER

IMO: 9409302
Type: Gas carrier
Average cargo carried: 22,304 t
Flag (estimated): South Korea
Port of registry: Jeju
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.41 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SK shipping Co Ltd

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 23,321 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

153

Gas carrier (LPG) median 83.3 kg/nm (+84%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

20.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 41.8 (−51%)

Average speed

14.1 kn

Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.8 kn (+10%)

Fuel per day at sea

51.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,240 t

CO₂ emitted

7,024 t

Distance sailed

14,642 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,040 h

43 days, 12% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 111 kg/nm · median 81.5 (+37%)

49.8Ranks 289 of 355, lowest first124

Average speedThis ship 12.1 kn · median 12.6 (−4%)

8.8Faster than 43% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.6 (−56%)

14.4Ranks 57 of 355, lowest first120

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU50%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

173 t

2.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

G. FOREVER
Gas carrier (LPG) median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

G. FOREVER
Gas carrier (LPG) median

12.012.513.013.514.014.5

’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

G. FOREVER
Gas carrier (LPG) median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	−2.0 kn	−27%	−38%	−22%	−24%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 27%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	SK shipping Co Ltd	1,272	3,980	11,424	944	12.1	111	15.6	–
2023	not published	2,240	7,024	14,642	1,040	14.1	153	20.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Gas carrier (LPG) median	vs Gas carrier (LPG)	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	SK shipping Co Ltd	15.6	35.6	−56%	57 of 355	Korean Register	A
2023	not published	20.6	41.8	−51%	83 of 330	Korean Register	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.