Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

MED ARCTIC

IMO: 9410545
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 3,794 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.92 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: YMN Tanker Deniz Isletmeciligi

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,794 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

56.7 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−29%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

47.39

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+215%)

Average speed

9.0 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−19%)

Fuel per day at sea

12.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,413 t

CO₂ emitted

7,657 t

7,775 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

42,579 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,757 h

198 days, 54% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 56.7 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−29%)

52.8Ranks 197 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 9.0 kn · median 11.1 (−19%)

8.8Faster than 11% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 47.39 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+215%)

7.93Ranks 1,369 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports61%
From the EU18%
Into the EU17%
At berth in the EU4%

83% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,337 t).

Fuel burned laden

97% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

4.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MED ARCTIC
Chemical tanker median

40.060.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MED ARCTIC
Chemical tanker median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MED ARCTIC
Chemical tanker median

0.025.050.075.0100125

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.8 kn	−18%	−25%	+26%	−37%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 18%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.6 kn	+28%	+21%	−31%	+85%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 28%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.4 kn	+3%	+7%	+29%	+2%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	−54%	−56%	+18%	−63%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 54%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	+117%	+107%	−26%	+175%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 117%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.1 kn	−6%	+30%	+11%	−16%	3.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.5 kn	+5%	−1%	+5%	+16%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	YMN Tanker Deniz Isletmeciligi	2,413	7,657	42,579	4,757	9.0	56.7	47.39	3%
2024	YMN Tanker Deniz Isletmeciligi	2,326	7,302	33,703	3,433	9.8	69.0	75.72	–
2023	not published	2,640	8,290	48,939	4,709	10.4	53.9	41.01	–
2022	not published	1,991	6,252	37,949	3,807	10.0	52.5	40.36	–
2021	not published	3,645	11,626	32,160	3,071	10.5	113.3	108.73	1%
2020	not published	2,248	7,207	43,173	3,901	11.1	52.1	39.49	–
2019	not published	2,152	6,821	39,019	4,888	8.0	55.2	46.81	–
2018	not published	1,966	6,178	37,299	4,408	8.5	52.7	40.24	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	YMN Tanker Deniz Isletmeciligi	47.39	15.04	+215%	1,369 of 1,460	Lloyd's Register	A
2024	YMN Tanker Deniz Isletmeciligi	75.72	16.73	+353%	1,254 of 1,274	Lloyd's Register	A
2023	not published	41.01	16.23	+153%	1,159 of 1,314	Lloyd's Register	A+B
2022	not published	40.36	16.06	+151%	1,265 of 1,409	Lloyd's Register	A+B
2021	not published	108.73	16.69	+551%	1,342 of 1,343	Lloyd's Register	A+B
2020	not published	39.49	16.16	+144%	1,166 of 1,312	Lloyd's Register	A+B
2019	not published	46.81	17.32	+170%	1,222 of 1,321	Lloyd's Register	A+B
2018	not published	40.24	17.14	+135%	1,128 of 1,294	Lloyd's Register	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.