Navalyze · Container · Ship

KILIA

IMO: 9412517
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 7,513 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 20.06 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: PHILEMON, ARA AMSTERDAM

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Danz Shipping GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,203 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

91.8

Container median 182 kg/nm (−50%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

46.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+129%)

Average speed

13.2 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−4%)

Fuel per day at sea

29.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,308 t

CO₂ emitted

22,881 t

Distance sailed

79,634 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,054 h

252 days, 69% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 90.2 kg/nm · median 177 (−49%)

78.8Ranks 404 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 7.9 kn · median 13.3 (−41%)

9.1Faster than 5% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 37.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+131%)

7.22Ranks 1,839 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports70%
From the EU13%
Into the EU13%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,053 t

4.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

KILIA
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

KILIA
Container median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

KILIA
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.9 kn	−3%	−29%	−14%	−20%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	+14%	+9%	−12%	+27%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	−3%	−7%	−0%	−5%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	+4%	+8%	+6%	+18%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.1 kn	−17%	−23%	−4%	−27%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	+1%	−0%	−33%	−10%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	+5%	+0%	−3%	+8%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Danz Shipping GmbH & Co. KG	3,600	11,303	39,929	5,027	7.9	90.2	37.7	–
2024part-year	ARA Amsterdam Shipping b.v.	1,094	3,439	12,007	1,144	10.5	91.1	47.1	–
2024	DT-Bereederungs GmbH & Co. KG	4,315	13,536	46,283	4,272	10.8	93.2	46.8	–
2023	not published	4,295	13,606	52,692	4,646	11.3	81.5	36.8	–
2022	not published	4,446	14,222	52,708	4,467	11.8	84.3	38.8	–
2021	not published	4,048	12,956	49,754	4,385	11.3	81.4	32.9	–
2020	not published	5,046	15,964	51,671	4,175	12.4	97.7	45.1	–
2019	not published	7,415	23,206	76,959	6,125	12.6	96.3	50.0	–
2018	not published	7,308	22,881	79,634	6,054	13.2	91.8	46.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Danz Shipping GmbH & Co. KG	37.7	16.3	+131%	1,839 of 2,208	DNV	B
2024part-year	ARA Amsterdam Shipping b.v.	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	B+C
2024	DT-Bereederungs GmbH & Co. KG	46.8	17.5	+167%	1,715 of 1,974	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	36.8	19.4	+90%	1,487 of 1,899	Verifavia	B+C
2022	not published	38.8	19.1	+103%	1,467 of 1,825	Verifavia	B+C
2021	not published	32.9	17.9	+84%	1,364 of 1,781	Verifavia	B+C
2020	not published	45.1	17.6	+157%	1,549 of 1,797	Verifavia	B+C
2019	not published	50.0	18.9	+165%	1,548 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	46.3	20.2	+129%	1,430 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.