Navalyze · Container · Ship

NYK REMUS

IMO: 9416965
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 30,733 t
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.40 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD · part of NYK

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 30,733 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

160.2 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−9%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

16.39

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+1%)

Average speed

13.1 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−2%)

Fuel per day at sea

50.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,438 t

CO₂ emitted

13,953 t

14,171 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

27,700 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,115 h

88 days, 24% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 160.2 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−9%)

78.8Ranks 996 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 13.1 kn · median 13.3 (−2%)

9.1Faster than 46% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 16.39 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+1%)

7.22Ranks 1,111 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports14%
From the EU79%
Into the EU3%
At berth in the EU4%

59% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (8,276 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

NYK REMUS
Container median

140.0160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NYK REMUS
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NYK REMUS
Container median

15.017.520.022.525.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.7 kn	−1%	+5%	+58%	–	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	+5%	+5%	−6%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.4 kn	−26%	−23%	+20%	−23%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−5.4 kn	−9%	−37%	+18%	−15%	5.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+3.0 kn	+39%	+68%	−61%	+47%	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 39%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.2 kn	−10%	−17%	−18%	−11%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−1.9 kn	−6%	−16%	−8%	−7%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	4,438	13,953	27,700	2,115	13.1	160.2	16.39	–
2024	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	2,833	8,957	17,569	1,416	12.4	161.2	–	–
2023	not published	2,848	9,056	18,636	1,500	12.4	152.8	15.35	–
2022	not published	3,191	10,140	15,551	1,297	12.0	205.2	19.92	–
2021	not published	2,961	9,415	13,162	756	17.4	224.9	23.45	–
2020	not published	5,404	17,128	33,358	2,315	14.4	162.0	15.94	–
2019	not published	7,353	23,082	40,731	2,610	15.6	180.5	17.85	–
2018	not published	8,532	26,759	44,197	2,530	17.5	193.0	19.16	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	16.39	16.30	+1%	1,111 of 2,208	ClassNK	B+C
2024	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	15.35	19.40	−21%	750 of 1,899	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	19.92	19.13	+4%	940 of 1,825	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	23.45	17.90	+31%	1,133 of 1,781	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	15.94	17.58	−9%	789 of 1,797	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	17.85	18.88	−5%	839 of 1,788	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	19.16	20.22	−5%	793 of 1,705	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.