Navalyze

Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

SUCCESS

IMO
9418133
Type
Oil tanker
Average cargo carried
33,496 t
Port of registry
Majuro
Technical efficiency
EEXI 4.49 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
NAVIG8 SUCCESS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Blue Line Ship Management SA

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 33,496 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
110.3 kg/nm
Oil tanker median 128.5 kg/nm (−14%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
10.39
g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+31%)
Average speed
6.8 kn
Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−36%)
Fuel per day at sea
18.1 t/day
Fuel consumed
894 t
CO₂ emitted
2,819 t
2,863 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
8,099 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,185 h
49 days, 14% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 110.3 kg/nm · median 128.5 (−14%)
76.1Ranks 523 of 1,665, lowest first190.8
Average speedThis ship 6.8 kn · median 10.7 (−36%)
8.0Faster than 4% of oil tanker ships12.1
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.39 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+31%)
4.51Ranks 1,097 of 1,665, lowest first27.66
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports20%
  • From the EU35%
  • Into the EU41%
  • At berth in the EU5%

62% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,750 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
4.6%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.0 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • SUCCESS
  • Oil tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • SUCCESS
  • Oil tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • SUCCESS
  • Oil tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025+1.3 kn+14%+41%−31%−48%1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−7.6 kn−9%−62%−36%+78%7.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+1.6 kn−8%+5%+37%+5%1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022+0.4 kn+17%+20%−49%−1%0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2021+2.0 kn−3%+19%+163%+18%2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025Blue Line Ship Management SA8942,8198,0991,1856.8110.310.39–
2024Blue Line Ship Management SA1,1393,57611,7892,1315.596.619.91–
2023not published1,9616,21618,4891,40813.1106.111.18–
2022not published1,5674,96113,5211,18111.5115.910.68–
2021not published2,6398,35426,5812,39311.199.310.78–
2019not published1,0333,23010,1121,1179.1102.29.12–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOil tanker medianvs Oil tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025Blue Line Ship Management SA10.397.95+31%1,097 of 1,665Lloyd's RegisterA
2024Blue Line Ship Management SA19.918.06+147%1,528 of 1,787Lloyd's RegisterA
2023not published11.188.44+32%1,233 of 1,797Korean Register–
2022not published10.688.51+25%1,273 of 1,961Korean RegisterA
2021not published10.788.86+22%1,132 of 1,789Korean RegisterA
2019not published9.128.83+3%1,011 of 1,919Korean RegisterA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

SUCCESS (IMO 9418133): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2019–2025 | Navalyze