Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Blue Line Ship Management SAyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Blue Line Ship Management SA | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 3 |
| CO₂ emitted | 23 kt+108.7% |
| Fuel per mile | 101 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 9.8 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 8.0% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Oil tanker |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0
- Blue Line Ship Management SA11.2 (+40% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blue Line Ship Management SA | 2 | 11.2 | +40% | 108 | 9.1 | 1,889 | 7.0% | – |
| Segment median | 8.0 | 0% |
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0
- Blue Line Ship Management SA9.3 (−38% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blue Line Ship Management SA | 1 | 9.3 | −38% | 94 | 10.6 | 3,576 | 9.1% | – |
| Segment median | 15.0 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blue Line Ship Management SA | Lloyd's Register (3) | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Blue Line Ship Management SA: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STRENGTH | 9418145 | Oil tanker | 11.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.4 | +15% | 10.1 | 8,782 t | €261k |
| OCEAN PRINCESS I | 9391517 | Chemical tanker | 9.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +13% | 10.6 | 11,210 t | €338k |
| SUCCESS | 9418133 | Oil tanker | 10.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.4 | 0% | 6.8 | 2,819 t | €92k |
30 of 3 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.