Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

STENA HOLLANDICA

IMO: 9419163
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Hoek Van Holland
Technical efficiency: EEXI 16.88 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IB

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Stena Line BV · part of Stena

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

266

Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (+72%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

1,421

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 815 (+74%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

127

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 226 (−44%)

Average speed

15.7 kn

Ro-pax median 16.2 kn (−3%)

Fuel per day at sea

99.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

21,510 t

CO₂ emitted

67,204 t

Distance sailed

80,948 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,166 h

215 days, 59% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 241 kg/nm · median 150 (+61%)

69.3Ranks 380 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 13.9 kn · median 15.8 (−12%)

12.0Faster than 28% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 815 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+44%)

66.8Ranks 265 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 156 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−38%)

48.6Ranks 145 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU53%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,507 t

3.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

STENA HOLLANDICA
Ro-pax median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

STENA HOLLANDICA
Ro-pax median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

STENA HOLLANDICA
Ro-pax median

50.0100150200250300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

STENA HOLLANDICA
Ro-pax median

5001,0001,5002,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	−3%	−8%	+5%	+16%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.6 kn	−6%	−9%	−5%	−1%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+1.1 kn	+11%	+19%	+2%	−1%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.6 kn	−11%	−19%	−1%	−50%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.3 kn	+2%	+20%	+9%	−28%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.0 kn	+6%	−2%	−10%	+123%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.2 kn	−7%	−14%	−0%	−6%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Stena Line BV	19,763	61,727	81,955	5,909	13.9	241	–	–
2024	Stena Line BV	19,413	60,656	78,295	5,350	14.6	248	–	–
2023	not published	21,581	67,391	82,040	5,395	15.2	263	–	–
2022	not published	19,111	59,678	80,407	5,695	14.1	238	–	–
2021	not published	21,510	67,204	80,948	5,166	15.7	266	–	–
2020	not published	19,256	60,225	73,988	5,534	13.4	260	–	–
2019	not published	20,141	63,010	81,859	5,703	14.4	246	–	–
2018	not published	21,698	67,839	82,163	5,261	15.6	264	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Stena Line BV	815	567	+44%	265 of 408	156	253	−38%	DNV	C
2024	Stena Line BV	702	547	+28%	236 of 404	147	233	−37%	DNV	C
2023	not published	709	680	+4%	207 of 386	133	234	−43%	DNV	C
2022	not published	717	626	+15%	210 of 394	140	253	−45%	DNV	C
2021	not published	1,421	815	+74%	299 of 377	127	226	−44%	DNV	C
2020	not published	1,977	751	+163%	327 of 387	94.8	217	−56%	Lloyd's Register	C
2019	not published	888	569	+56%	259 of 394	61.3	223	−72%	Lloyd's Register	–
2018	not published	941	729	+29%	215 of 361	58.0	184	−68%	Lloyd's Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.