Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

LIVIA

IMO: 9420423
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Denmark
Port of registry: Hellerup
Technical efficiency: EEXI 27.52 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC
Former names: ETRETAT, STENA LIVIA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Stena Rederi AS · part of Stena

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

127

Ro-pax median 153 kg/nm (−17%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

794

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 680 (+17%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

105

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 234 (−55%)

Average speed

18.3 kn

Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

55.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,925 t

CO₂ emitted

47,109 t

Distance sailed

117,890 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,451 h

269 days, 74% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2024

Set against all 404 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 122 kg/nm · median 151 (−19%)

73.1Ranks 119 of 404, lowest first237

Average speedThis ship 18.3 kn · median 15.7 (+17%)

11.7Faster than 71% of ro-pax ships22.4

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 689 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 547 (+26%)

58.4Ranks 231 of 404, lowest first1,957

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 93.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 233 (−60%)

30.8Ranks 103 of 404, lowest first1,069

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports94%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,662 t

5.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LIVIA
Ro-pax median

100.0200.0300.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

LIVIA
Ro-pax median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

LIVIA
Ro-pax median

0.05001,0001,500

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

LIVIA
Ro-pax median

0.05001,0001,500

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	−4%	−3%	−1%	−13%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−1.1 kn	−9%	−14%	+8%	−9%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+1.9 kn	−6%	+4%	+18%	−37%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+4.7 kn	−55%	−38%	+1,340%	+59%	4.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 55%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.8 kn	+114%	+88%	−93%	+126%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 114%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+2.1 kn	−2%	+14%	+56%	+57%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Stena Rederi AS	4,913	15,438	37,155	2,067	18.0	132	–	–
2024	Stena Rederi AS	14,291	45,067	117,178	6,399	18.3	122	–	–
2023	not published	14,925	47,109	117,890	6,451	18.3	127	–	–
2022	not published	15,114	47,727	108,662	5,596	19.4	139	–	–
2021	not published	13,678	43,295	92,221	5,267	17.5	148	–	–
2020	not published	2,089	6,697	6,403	501	12.8	326	–	–
2019	not published	13,211	42,354	86,758	5,956	14.6	152	–	–
2018	not published	8,688	27,854	55,765	4,476	12.5	156	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Stena Rederi AS	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	DNV	C
2024	Stena Rederi AS	689	547	+26%	231 of 404	93.1	233	−60%	DNV	C
2023	not published	794	680	+17%	225 of 386	105	234	−55%	DNV	C
2022	not published	876	626	+40%	242 of 394	107	253	−58%	DNV	C
2021	not published	1,397	815	+71%	297 of 377	153	226	−32%	DNV	C
2020	not published	877	751	+17%	208 of 387	1,142	217	+425%	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	388	569	−32%	148 of 394	457	223	+105%	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	247	729	−66%	107 of 361	319	184	+73%	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.