Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

PRAGUE

IMO: 9421324
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 15,715 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.96 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MR EUPHRATES

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: IMS S.A.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 15,715 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

131.3 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+65%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

26.32

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+75%)

Average speed

12.5 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

39.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

748 t

CO₂ emitted

2,357 t

2,394 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

5,699 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

457 h

19 days, 5% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 131.3 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+65%)

52.8Ranks 1,424 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 12.5 kn · median 11.1 (+13%)

8.8Faster than 91% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 26.32 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+75%)

7.93Ranks 1,111 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports46%
From the EU16%
Into the EU24%
At berth in the EU14%

80% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,885 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

14.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

PRAGUE
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PRAGUE
Chemical tanker median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PRAGUE
Chemical tanker median

10.015.020.025.030.0

’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	+30%	+25%	+9%	+163%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 30%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.7 kn	−2%	+12%	−64%	−63%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2023	+1.4 kn	−14%	−1%	+0%	+110%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.6 kn	−4%	−18%	+20%	+15%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.0 kn	−4%	+15%	+56%	−27%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	IMS S.A.	748	2,357	5,699	457	12.5	131.3	26.32	–
2024	IMS S.A.	528	1,662	5,234	403	13.0	100.9	10.02	–
2023	not published	1,515	4,790	14,681	1,296	11.3	103.2	27.18	–
2021	not published	1,752	5,542	14,640	1,482	9.9	119.7	12.95	–
2020	not published	1,529	4,825	12,226	1,063	11.5	125.0	11.31	–
2019	not published	1,024	3,205	7,847	823	9.5	130.6	15.59	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	IMS S.A.	26.32	15.04	+75%	1,111 of 1,460	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	IMS S.A.	10.02	16.73	−40%	248 of 1,274	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	27.18	16.23	+67%	982 of 1,314	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	12.95	16.69	−22%	404 of 1,343	DNV	B
2020	not published	11.31	16.16	−30%	273 of 1,312	ABS	B
2019	not published	15.59	17.32	−10%	548 of 1,321	ABS	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.