Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

SONGA BREEZE

IMO: 9423645
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 13,986 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EIV 11.29 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Songa Shipmanagement Ltd

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 13,986 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

70.7 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 80.8 kg/nm (−12%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.83

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.73 (−5%)

Average speed

10.4 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.0 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,740 t

CO₂ emitted

5,452 t

5,537 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

24,624 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,361 h

98 days, 27% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,274 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 70.7 kg/nm · median 80.8 (−12%)

53.8Ranks 424 of 1,274, lowest first110.8

Average speedThis ship 10.4 kn · median 11.0 (−5%)

8.7Faster than 36% of chemical tanker ships12.5

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.83 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.73 (−5%)

8.47Ranks 601 of 1,274, lowest first41.97

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports31%
From the EU16%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU4%

68% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,688 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SONGA BREEZE
Chemical tanker median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

SONGA BREEZE
Chemical tanker median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SONGA BREEZE
Chemical tanker median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	−6%	−8%	−26%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.7 kn	−8%	−1%	+2%	−21%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	−3%	−7%	+37%	−11%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−1.8 kn	+10%	−7%	+40%	+7%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.7 kn	+5%	+53%	+34%	−34%	3.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.1 kn	+16%	−7%	+73%	+80%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	Songa Shipmanagement Ltd	1,740	5,452	24,624	2,361	10.4	70.7	15.83	–
2023	not published	2,513	7,872	33,417	3,147	10.6	75.2	15.71	–
2022	not published	2,676	8,387	32,918	3,321	9.9	81.3	19.99	–
2021	not published	2,019	6,335	23,990	2,344	10.2	84.1	22.40	–
2020	not published	1,318	4,136	17,151	1,425	12.0	76.8	20.95	–
2019	not published	928	5,828	12,759	1,539	8.3	72.8	31.54	–
2018	not published	462	1,445	7,379	712	10.4	62.6	17.56	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	Songa Shipmanagement Ltd	15.83	16.73	−5%	601 of 1,274	Korean Register	B
2023	not published	15.71	16.23	−3%	627 of 1,314	Korean Register	B
2022	not published	19.99	16.06	+24%	888 of 1,409	Korean Register	A
2021	not published	22.40	16.69	+34%	920 of 1,343	Korean Register	B
2020	not published	20.95	16.16	+30%	876 of 1,312	Korean Register	B
2019	not published	31.54	17.32	+82%	1,058 of 1,321	Korean Register	B
2018	not published	17.56	17.14	+2%	672 of 1,294	Korean Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.