Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Songa Shipmanagement Ltdyour view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| Songa Shipmanagement Ltd | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 23 |
| CO₂ emitted | 240 kt |
| Fuel per mile | 105 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 10.5 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 12.9% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Chemical tanker |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7
- Songa Shipmanagement Ltd33.5 (+100% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Songa Shipmanagement Ltd | 15 | 33.5 | +100% | 93 | 9.3 | 3,192 | 16.2% | – |
| Segment median | 16.7 | 0% |
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 17.5
- Songa Shipmanagement Ltd24.2 (+38% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Songa Shipmanagement Ltd | 5 | 24.2 | +38% | 126 | 14.1 | 2,972 | 3.9% | – |
| Segment median | 17.5 | 0% |
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- Songa Shipmanagement Ltd37.2 (+362% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Songa Shipmanagement Ltd | 3 | 37.2 | +362% | 106 | 9.8 | 3,153 | 23.9% | – |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Songa Shipmanagement Ltd | Korean Register (23) | 0% | 96% | 4% | 0% |
Songa Shipmanagement Ltd: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SONGA OPAL | 9473913 | Oil tanker | 55.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 25.2 | +119% | 7.8 | 9,657 t | €254k |
| SONGA AURORA | 9373632 | Chemical tanker | 41.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 23.7 | +76% | 9.2 | 8,218 t | €194k |
| SONGA ATLANTIC | 9447328 | Chemical tanker | 40.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 23.7 | +72% | 7.3 | 9,573 t | €269k |
| SONGA RUBY | 9444479 | Chemical tanker | 40.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 23.7 | +69% | 9.4 | 10,483 t | €270k |
| SONGA TAURUS | 9373644 | Chemical tanker | 40.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 23.7 | +69% | 9.8 | 8,090 t | €205k |
| SONGA PEARL | 9444455 | Oil tanker | 37.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 25.2 | +48% | 10.8 | 10,189 t | €250k |
| SONGA ORION | 9831024 | Chemical tanker | 34.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 23.7 | +45% | 9.8 | 9,273 t | €270k |
| SONGA COSMOS | 9457024 | Chemical tanker | 34.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 23.7 | +45% | 10.2 | 12,261 t | €363k |
| SONGA SAPPHIRE | 9444467 | Oil tanker | 36.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 25.2 | +43% | 10.8 | 10,892 t | €294k |
| SONGA JADE | 9473925 | Chemical tanker | 32.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 23.7 | +38% | 6.8 | 8,705 t | €251k |
| SONGA FALCON | 9396012 | Chemical tanker | 29.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 23.7 | +26% | 11.5 | 7,370 t | €124k |
| SONGA PUMA | 9399789 | Container | 25.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +18% | 14.3 | 23,015 t | €414k |
| SANTA MARTA EXPRESS | 9446104 | Container | 24.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +11% | 14.3 | 24,438 t | €41k |
| SONGA EAGLE | 9388704 | Chemical tanker | 25.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 23.7 | +9% | 8.8 | 10,759 t | €323k |
| PUERTO LIMON EXPRESS | 9434943 | Container | 23.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +6% | 14.5 | 26,039 t | €59k |
| SONGA POLARIS | 9457749 | Chemical tanker | 25.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 23.7 | +6% | 10.3 | 11,890 t | €323k |
| SONGA BREEZE | 9423645 | Chemical tanker | 15.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | −4% | 10.4 | 5,452 t | €111k |
| SONGA WINDS | 9416109 | Chemical tanker | 19.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 23.7 | −19% | 10.4 | 2,673 t | €54k |
| SONGA PANTHER | 9947732 | Container | 17.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | −21% | 13.2 | 7,308 t | €218k |
| SONGA WOLF | 9373498 | Container | 32.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 47.2 | −31% | 13.6 | 2,260 t | €38k |
30 of 23 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.