Navalyze · Container · Ship

CHRISTINA

IMO: 9429211
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 4,332 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 23.76 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: BAKKAFOSS, CERES

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Langh Ship Oy Ab

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,243 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

91.2

Container median 182 kg/nm (−50%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

45.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+127%)

Average speed

13.8 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+0%)

Fuel per day at sea

30.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,365 t

CO₂ emitted

19,968 t

Distance sailed

69,788 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,047 h

210 days, 58% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 83.5 kg/nm · median 177 (−53%)

78.8Ranks 302 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 7.5 kn · median 13.3 (−44%)

9.1Faster than 4% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 60.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+272%)

7.22Ranks 2,117 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports58%
From the EU14%
Into the EU21%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,488 t

7.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CHRISTINA
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CHRISTINA
Container median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CHRISTINA
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−5.2 kn	−12%	−48%	−55%	+2%	5.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	+4%	+3%	−3%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.0 kn	+5%	+13%	+15%	+25%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	+0%	−1%	−8%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2021	−0.3 kn	−6%	−8%	+12%	−2%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−1.5 kn	+2%	−9%	−8%	+16%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Langh Ship Oy Ab	2,750	8,641	32,936	4,408	7.5	83.5	60.6	100%
2024	Langh Ship Oy Ab	7,039	21,959	73,769	5,821	12.7	95.4	59.3	–
2023	not published	6,955	21,819	75,787	5,929	12.8	91.8	62.9	–
2022	not published	5,759	18,281	65,740	5,559	11.8	87.6	50.5	–
2021	not published	6,268	19,701	71,673	5,972	12.0	87.5	51.7	–
2019	not published	5,932	18,625	63,934	5,185	12.3	92.8	53.0	–
2018	not published	6,365	19,968	69,788	5,047	13.8	91.2	45.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Langh Ship Oy Ab	60.6	16.3	+272%	2,117 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	Langh Ship Oy Ab	59.3	17.5	+239%	1,852 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	62.9	19.4	+224%	1,804 of 1,899	DNV	B
2022	not published	50.5	19.1	+164%	1,619 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	51.7	17.9	+189%	1,619 of 1,781	DNV	A
2019	not published	53.0	18.9	+181%	1,586 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	45.8	20.2	+127%	1,425 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.